Describe how Webhooks are used in the WoT context #319
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Resolve Editor's note in section 9.1: Describe how Webhooks are used in the WoT context. Explain listeners, data payloads, dataResponse payloads. Create normative language on multiple subscriptions to the same event by the same consumer.
|
I think that it is important to mention that the Consumer needs to be an HTTP server for Webhook to work. |
mlagally
requested review from
egekorkan,
sebastiankb,
chachamimm,
mmccool and
mryuichi
Agreed, please draft additional text for that section. |
|
Arch call on Nov 23rd: |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Resolve Editor's notes in section 9.1:
Describe how Webhooks are used in the WoT context. Explain listeners, data payloads, dataResponse payloads. Create normative language on multiple subscriptions to the same event by the same consumer.
Preview | Diff