Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reference device #69

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Reference device #69

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

mlagally
Copy link
Contributor

@mlagally mlagally commented Feb 18, 2021

Additionally all TDs that were used during the PlugFests showed that 95% of TDs were around 8KB in size.
</p>
<p>
A maximum size of a TD of 16 KB leaves enough headroom and can be still handled on embedded devices with 64-128KB of RAM.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As discussed in today's meeting, many WoT produces are not able to fulfill such kind of limitation. E.g., a Sentron PAC has over 50 different datapoints (s. page 99).

This 16k limit is mainly meant to address WoT consumer. But what are realistic use cases? I assume that a node that also consume TDs will always be more powerful than a WoT producer only.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sebastiankb
Thanks Sebastian, this makes the discussion much more concrete.
Which size limit would you recommend for TDs produced by this device?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So far, I see no need for such a restriction in the core profile with HTTP/JSON. But maybe I'm missing something. I would recommend that in the next session we discuss what kind of (realistic) scenarios you need for this constraint. A good orientation can be this figure here.

@mlagally
Copy link
Contributor Author

virtual F2F on 23.6.:
We won't consider use cases where a small device consumes TD.
Close without merging.

@mlagally mlagally closed this Jun 23, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants