Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Web Audio API: Add error reporting via AudioContext.onerror #950

Closed
1 task done
gsinafirooz opened this issue Apr 30, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed
1 task done

Web Audio API: Add error reporting via AudioContext.onerror #950

gsinafirooz opened this issue Apr 30, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
Resolution: decline The TAG declines to review this work. We don't think our review would add much. We don't object.

Comments

@gsinafirooz
Copy link

gsinafirooz commented Apr 30, 2024

こんにちは TAG-さん!

I'm requesting a TAG review of AudioContext.onerror.

Report a failure from acquiring system audio resources and audio rendering errors to web applications via a callback assigned to AudioContext.onerror.

Further details:

  • I have reviewed the TAG's Web Platform Design Principles
  • The group where the incubation/design work on this is being done (or is intended to be done in the future): W3C Audio Working Group and W3C Audio Community Group
  • The group where standardization of this work is intended to be done ("unknown" if not known): W3C Audio Working Group and W3C Audio Community Group
  • Existing major pieces of multi-stakeholder review or discussion of this design: github.com/AudioContext.onerror WebAudio/web-audio-api#2580
  • Major unresolved issues with or opposition to this design: None
  • This work is being funded by: N/A
@martinthomson
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @gsinafirooz, thanks for filing this. What we can see looks reasonable, and we think that a more thorough review isn't warranted. Given that this is so small we're going to defer to the working group for this.

@martinthomson martinthomson added Resolution: decline The TAG declines to review this work. We don't think our review would add much. We don't object. and removed Progress: untriaged labels May 6, 2024
@LeaVerou
Copy link
Member

LeaVerou commented May 6, 2024

Also, we wanted to point out that we have Q & A section exactly for these types of smaller scope API design questions that is meant to be lighter process-wise than a design review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Resolution: decline The TAG declines to review this work. We don't think our review would add much. We don't object.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants