Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

yea 0.8.6 - Fix spurious print from vendor code #37

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 16, 2022
Merged

yea 0.8.6 - Fix spurious print from vendor code #37

merged 3 commits into from
Aug 16, 2022

Conversation

raubitsj
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@raubitsj raubitsj marked this pull request as ready for review August 16, 2022 23:37
@raubitsj raubitsj requested a review from a team August 16, 2022 23:38
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 16, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #37 (a7f712c) into main (ced485c) will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #37      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   62.60%   62.57%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          16       16              
  Lines        1369     1368       -1     
==========================================
- Hits          857      856       -1     
  Misses        512      512              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittest 62.57% <100.00%> (-0.03%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/yea/util.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/yea/__init__.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

@raubitsj raubitsj changed the title Fix spurious print from vendor code yea 0.8.6 - Fix spurious print from vendor code Aug 16, 2022
@raubitsj raubitsj merged commit 8ec49ec into main Aug 16, 2022
@raubitsj raubitsj deleted the fix-print branch August 16, 2022 23:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants