You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 9, 2020. It is now read-only.
Make the define simply syntactic sugar for lambdas? This would require explicitly stating the type in the define though. Or using the type checker while desugaring.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ward
changed the title
Define as syntactic sugar for lambdasDefine as syntactic sugar for lambdas
Dec 24, 2014
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Make the define simply syntactic sugar for lambdas? This would require explicitly stating the type in the define though. Or using the type checker while desugaring.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: