-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Minor changes. #5
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ction branch of close_and_free_session
Closed
Closed
Thanks for the patches, the remaining one got fixed in the meantime. |
Closed
Closed
Merkyrio
pushed a commit
to liveryvideo/libwebsockets
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2024
There is potential deadlock between lws_create_context and lws_service. This TSAN message would give more details (proprietary code backtrace was stripped): ================== WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: lock-order-inversion (potential deadlock) (pid=516380) Cycle in lock order graph: M0 (0x7bb4000016b8) => M1 (0x7bb400000360) => M0 Mutex M1 acquired here while holding mutex M0 in thread T2: #0 pthread_mutex_lock warmcat#1 lws_mutex_refcount_lock libwebsockets/lib/core/libwebsockets.c:1471:2 (libwebsockets.so.19+0x48ff2) warmcat#2 lws_wsi_inject_to_loop libwebsockets/lib/core-net/wsi.c:354:2 (libwebsockets.so.19+0xbf8d7) warmcat#3 __lws_create_event_pipes libwebsockets/lib/core-net/vhost.c:1172:8 (libwebsockets.so.19+0xb490f) warmcat#4 lws_create_context libwebsockets/lib/core/context.c:1302:6 (libwebsockets.so.19+0x3e592) Mutex M0 previously acquired by the same thread here: #0 pthread_mutex_lock warmcat#1 lws_mutex_refcount_lock libwebsockets/lib/core/libwebsockets.c:1471:2 (libwebsockets.so.19+0x48ff2) warmcat#2 lws_create_context libwebsockets/lib/core/context.c:1301:2 (libwebsockets.so.19+0x3e580) Mutex M0 acquired here while holding mutex M1 in thread T8: #0 pthread_mutex_lock warmcat#1 lws_mutex_refcount_lock libwebsockets/lib/core/libwebsockets.c:1471:2 (libwebsockets.so.19+0x48ff2) warmcat#2 lws_sul_plat_unix libwebsockets/lib/plat/unix/unix-init.c:64:2 (libwebsockets.so.19+0x1e4a1) warmcat#3 __lws_sul_service_ripe libwebsockets/lib/core-net/sorted-usec-list.c:161:3 (libwebsockets.so.19+0xbd871) warmcat#4 _lws_plat_service_tsi libwebsockets/lib/plat/unix/unix-service.c:125:7 (libwebsockets.so.19+0x1fc07) warmcat#5 lws_plat_service libwebsockets/lib/plat/unix/unix-service.c:235:9 (libwebsockets.so.19+0x20237) warmcat#6 lws_service libwebsockets/lib/core-net/service.c:838:6 (libwebsockets.so.19+0xbd0c2) Mutex M1 previously acquired by the same thread here: #0 pthread_mutex_lock warmcat#1 lws_mutex_refcount_lock libwebsockets/lib/core/libwebsockets.c:1471:2 (libwebsockets.so.19+0x48ff2) warmcat#2 _lws_plat_service_tsi libwebsockets/lib/plat/unix/unix-service.c:121:2 (libwebsockets.so.19+0x1fbee) warmcat#3 lws_plat_service libwebsockets/lib/plat/unix/unix-service.c:235:9 (libwebsockets.so.19+0x20237) warmcat#4 lws_service libwebsockets/lib/core-net/service.c:838:6 (libwebsockets.so.19+0xbd0c2) SUMMARY: ThreadSanitizer: lock-order-inversion (potential deadlock) in pthread_mutex_lock ==================
Merkyrio
pushed a commit
to liveryvideo/libwebsockets
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2024
There is potential deadlock between lws_create_context and lws_service. This TSAN message would give more details (proprietary code backtrace was stripped): ================== WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: lock-order-inversion (potential deadlock) (pid=516380) Cycle in lock order graph: M0 (0x7bb4000016b8) => M1 (0x7bb400000360) => M0 Mutex M1 acquired here while holding mutex M0 in thread T2: #0 pthread_mutex_lock warmcat#1 lws_mutex_refcount_lock libwebsockets/lib/core/libwebsockets.c:1471:2 (libwebsockets.so.19+0x48ff2) warmcat#2 lws_wsi_inject_to_loop libwebsockets/lib/core-net/wsi.c:354:2 (libwebsockets.so.19+0xbf8d7) warmcat#3 __lws_create_event_pipes libwebsockets/lib/core-net/vhost.c:1172:8 (libwebsockets.so.19+0xb490f) warmcat#4 lws_create_context libwebsockets/lib/core/context.c:1302:6 (libwebsockets.so.19+0x3e592) Mutex M0 previously acquired by the same thread here: #0 pthread_mutex_lock warmcat#1 lws_mutex_refcount_lock libwebsockets/lib/core/libwebsockets.c:1471:2 (libwebsockets.so.19+0x48ff2) warmcat#2 lws_create_context libwebsockets/lib/core/context.c:1301:2 (libwebsockets.so.19+0x3e580) Mutex M0 acquired here while holding mutex M1 in thread T8: #0 pthread_mutex_lock warmcat#1 lws_mutex_refcount_lock libwebsockets/lib/core/libwebsockets.c:1471:2 (libwebsockets.so.19+0x48ff2) warmcat#2 lws_sul_plat_unix libwebsockets/lib/plat/unix/unix-init.c:64:2 (libwebsockets.so.19+0x1e4a1) warmcat#3 __lws_sul_service_ripe libwebsockets/lib/core-net/sorted-usec-list.c:161:3 (libwebsockets.so.19+0xbd871) warmcat#4 _lws_plat_service_tsi libwebsockets/lib/plat/unix/unix-service.c:125:7 (libwebsockets.so.19+0x1fc07) warmcat#5 lws_plat_service libwebsockets/lib/plat/unix/unix-service.c:235:9 (libwebsockets.so.19+0x20237) warmcat#6 lws_service libwebsockets/lib/core-net/service.c:838:6 (libwebsockets.so.19+0xbd0c2) Mutex M1 previously acquired by the same thread here: #0 pthread_mutex_lock warmcat#1 lws_mutex_refcount_lock libwebsockets/lib/core/libwebsockets.c:1471:2 (libwebsockets.so.19+0x48ff2) warmcat#2 _lws_plat_service_tsi libwebsockets/lib/plat/unix/unix-service.c:121:2 (libwebsockets.so.19+0x1fbee) warmcat#3 lws_plat_service libwebsockets/lib/plat/unix/unix-service.c:235:9 (libwebsockets.so.19+0x20237) warmcat#4 lws_service libwebsockets/lib/core-net/service.c:838:6 (libwebsockets.so.19+0xbd0c2) SUMMARY: ThreadSanitizer: lock-order-inversion (potential deadlock) in pthread_mutex_lock ==================
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Updated with new merge (thanks). Only patch left is the fix for erroneous byte count in write function.
Would you like me to put together a test function to prove that there is a problem?