Skip to content

use native inverse modulo when available #220

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2020
Merged

use native inverse modulo when available #220

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2020

Conversation

tomato42
Copy link
Member

@tomato42 tomato42 commented Dec 2, 2020

the builtin pow() can handle negative powers on python 3.8 and later,
so do use it

@tomato42 tomato42 added the feature functionality to be implemented label Dec 2, 2020
@tomato42 tomato42 self-assigned this Dec 2, 2020
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 2, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.002%) to 98.363% when pulling 0d5dffa on tomato42:fast-native-inverse into 90bb8ae on warner:master.

@tomato42
use native inverse modulo when available
0d5dffa 
the builtin pow() can handle negative powers on python 3.8 and later,
so do use it
@tomato42 tomato42 force-pushed the fast-native-inverse branch from 6178f4c to 0d5dffa Compare December 2, 2020 20:20
@tomato42
Copy link
Member Author

tomato42 commented Dec 2, 2020

Ci run: https://travis-ci.org/github/warner/python-ecdsa/builds/747283435

@tomato42 tomato42 merged commit 58ea273 into tlsfuzzer:master Dec 3, 2020
@tomato42 tomato42 deleted the fast-native-inverse branch December 3, 2020 09:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@tomato42 tomato42

Labels
feature functionality to be implemented
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@tomato42 @coveralls