Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Agenda for Sep 22 meeting #140

Closed
foolip opened this issue Sep 21, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

Agenda for Sep 22 meeting #140

foolip opened this issue Sep 21, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
agenda Agenda item for the next meeting

Comments

@foolip
Copy link
Member

foolip commented Sep 21, 2022

Here's the agenda for our meeting tomorrow:

Previous meeting: #131

@foolip foolip added the agenda Agenda item for the next meeting label Sep 21, 2022
@foolip
Copy link
Member Author

foolip commented Sep 21, 2022

@gsnedders feel free to edit the agenda with the specific points to raise for the first two agenda items.

@foolip
Copy link
Member Author

foolip commented Sep 22, 2022

Brief notes

Present: @bkardell @robnyman @jensimmons @jgraham @t @dlibby- @howard-e @nt1m @foolip

Taking notes: @foolip

For #65 and #93, we speculate that the discussion might be around the spec status of these. Skipping until next time, as @gsnedders is not present.

@jensimmons the CSSWG just resolved to take on anchor positions. It's now in Tab's personal repo. Overall, all of this is early days.

#102 - requesting @karlcow and @jgraham to take a look.

#139, @davidsgrogan can you let the CSSWG know about this test, that it's passing in all browsers, and what needs fixing in the spec to resolve this test in particular?

Editing investigation effort

@jgraham: Should have the next meeting in October.

Web Almanac

@bkardell: There's a markdown draft now, some final fixes needed. Please review at https://20220922t161618-dot-webalmanac.uk.r.appspot.com/en/2022/interop. Comment on HTTPArchive/almanac.httparchive.org#3145 with any feedback.

@gsnedders
Copy link
Member

For #65 and #93, we speculate that the discussion might be around the spec status of these. Skipping until next time, as @gsnedders is not present.

FWIW, my interest was primarily in making sure we didn't forget about this and we close them if there's no follow-up.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
agenda Agenda item for the next meeting
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants