Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test multi-global Blob/ArrayBuffers from web sockets #4067

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 28, 2016

Conversation

domenic
Copy link
Member

@domenic domenic commented Oct 24, 2016

@Ms2ger to review I believe.

@wpt-pr-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Reviewers for this pull request are: @Jxck, @Ms2ger, @jdm, @kristijanburnik, @plehegar, @sideshowbarker, @zcorpan, and @zqzhang.

@wpt-stability-bot
Copy link

Firefox

Testing revision 0ecd4de1ddf0eea550ed4462514dc63f436d055a
Starting 10 test iterations
All results were stable

All results

/websockets/multi-globals/message-received.html

Subtest Results
OK
ArrayBuffer should be created in the relevant realm of the WebSocket PASS
Blob should be created in the relevant realm of the WebSocket PASS

@wpt-stability-bot
Copy link

Chrome

Testing revision 0ecd4de1ddf0eea550ed4462514dc63f436d055a
Starting 10 test iterations
All results were stable

All results

/websockets/multi-globals/message-received.html

Subtest Results
OK
ArrayBuffer should be created in the relevant realm of the WebSocket PASS
Blob should be created in the relevant realm of the WebSocket PASS

@wpt-stability-bot
Copy link

Firefox

Testing revision 1739e2b
Starting 10 test iterations
All results were stable

All results

/websockets/multi-globals/message-received.html

Subtest Results
OK
ArrayBuffer should be created in the relevant realm of the WebSocket PASS
Blob should be created in the relevant realm of the WebSocket PASS

@wpt-stability-bot
Copy link

Chrome

Testing revision 1739e2b
Starting 10 test iterations
All results were stable

All results

/websockets/multi-globals/message-received.html

Subtest Results
OK
ArrayBuffer should be created in the relevant realm of the WebSocket PASS
Blob should be created in the relevant realm of the WebSocket PASS

@ayg ayg closed this Oct 26, 2016
@ayg ayg deleted the websocket-multi-globals branch October 26, 2016 17:37
@zcorpan zcorpan restored the websocket-multi-globals branch October 26, 2016 19:53
@zcorpan zcorpan reopened this Oct 26, 2016
@wpt-stability-bot
Copy link

Chrome

Testing revision 4fde5c2
Starting 10 test iterations
All results were stable

All results

/websockets/multi-globals/message-received.html

Subtest Results
OK
ArrayBuffer should be created in the relevant realm of the WebSocket PASS
Blob should be created in the relevant realm of the WebSocket PASS

@wpt-stability-bot
Copy link

Firefox

Testing revision 4fde5c2
Starting 10 test iterations
All results were stable

All results

/websockets/multi-globals/message-received.html

Subtest Results
OK
ArrayBuffer should be created in the relevant realm of the WebSocket PASS
Blob should be created in the relevant realm of the WebSocket PASS

@wpt-stability-bot
Copy link

Firefox

Testing revision 94ed008
Starting 10 test iterations
All results were stable

All results

/websockets/multi-globals/message-received.html

Subtest Results
OK
ArrayBuffer should be created in the relevant realm of the WebSocket PASS
Blob should be created in the relevant realm of the WebSocket PASS

@wpt-stability-bot
Copy link

Chrome

Testing revision 94ed008
Starting 10 test iterations
All results were stable

All results

/websockets/multi-globals/message-received.html

Subtest Results
OK
ArrayBuffer should be created in the relevant realm of the WebSocket PASS
Blob should be created in the relevant realm of the WebSocket PASS

@Ms2ger Ms2ger merged commit 6787b5b into master Oct 28, 2016
@Ms2ger Ms2ger deleted the websocket-multi-globals branch October 28, 2016 09:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants