Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Severe Bug] When placing new blocks. #55

Closed
Bokonom opened this issue Feb 24, 2011 · 9 comments
Closed

[Severe Bug] When placing new blocks. #55

Bokonom opened this issue Feb 24, 2011 · 9 comments
Labels

Comments

@Bokonom
Copy link

Bokonom commented Feb 24, 2011

Using v.0.13 DynMap & v.1.3_01 Minecraft.
Upon placing a new block, DynMap causes the server to spam errors like:
(eventually crashes the server).

[INFO] Chunk (-11, -3) stored at (-8, -6) 2011-02-24 10:11:22
[SEVERE] java.lang.Throwable 2011-02-24 10:11:22
[SEVERE] at net.minecraft.server.LongHashtable.get(LongHashtable.java:31) 2011-02-24 10:11:22
[SEVERE] at net.minecraft.server.ChunkProviderServer.b(ChunkProviderServer.java:107) 2011-02-24 10:11:22
[SEVERE] at net.minecraft.server.World.c(World.java:202) 2011-02-24 10:11:22
[SEVERE] at net.minecraft.server.World.getTypeId(World.java:145) 2011-02-24 10:11:22
[SEVERE] at org.bukkit.craftbukkit.CraftWorld.getBlockTypeIdAt(CraftWorld.java:60) 2011-02-24 10:11:22
[SEVERE] at org.dynmap.kzedmap.DefaultTileRenderer.scan(DefaultTileRenderer.java:115) 2011-02-24 10:11:22
[SEVERE] at org.dynmap.kzedmap.DefaultTileRenderer.render(DefaultTileRenderer.java:82) 2011-02-24 10:11:22
[SEVERE] at org.dynmap.kzedmap.KzedMap.render(KzedMap.java:189) 2011-02-24 10:11:22
[SEVERE] at org.dynmap.MapManager.render(MapManager.java:193) 2011-02-24 10:11:22
[SEVERE] at org.dynmap.MapManager$1.handle(MapManager.java:36) 2011-02-24 10:11:22
[SEVERE] at org.dynmap.MapManager$1.handle(MapManager.java:1) 2011-02-24 10:11:22
[SEVERE] at org.dynmap.AsynchronousQueue.running(AsynchronousQueue.java:92) 2011-02-24 10:11:22
[SEVERE] at org.dynmap.AsynchronousQueue.access$000(AsynchronousQueue.java:10) 2011-02-24 10:11:22
[SEVERE] at org.dynmap.AsynchronousQueue$1.run(AsynchronousQueue.java:58) 2011-02-24 10:11:22
[SEVERE] at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source) 2011-02-24 10:11:22

@FrozenCow
Copy link
Contributor

Try the latest CraftBukkit (438) and see whether that works. There were reports of a bug in CraftBukkit related to this.

@croxis
Copy link

croxis commented Feb 24, 2011

I'm updated to the latest craftbukkit and I too am getting this error.

@FrozenCow
Copy link
Contributor

Please state your CraftBukkit version/buildnumber when reporting.

@croxis
Copy link

croxis commented Feb 24, 2011

457

@dpvDuncan
Copy link

Same problem here with CraftBukkit #443
But it does not occur when I do it in the Nether...
Maybe a problem with Beds: The first time I noticed it was after placing a Bed in my server, but it continues to occur after removing it...

@FrozenCow
Copy link
Contributor

I'll see what the problem is this weekend and hope to pass a fix to the Bukkit-team.

@Bokonom
Copy link
Author

Bokonom commented Feb 27, 2011

Bug no longer occurs for me personally using:
-Same version of dynmap as previously.
-Same version of minecraft as previously.
-Build 456 Craftbukkit

Though I changed a couple huge things.. moved everything to a server with insane specs, minecraft with server use to use about 60% of the CPU before this, now only uses 15%.
Not sure if this could be related in any way, did end up removing voxelports, permissions and jail plugins due to the latest bukkit build.

Edit:
I accidentally clicked "Comment and Close" instead of "Comment" >-< Not sure if this bug still occurs for other people.

@FrozenCow
Copy link
Contributor

It would be great if anyone else could confirm this?

@studog
Copy link

studog commented Mar 1, 2011

I am getting the same error on anything past Bukkit 432 with Dynmap 0.13

This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants