-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: normalize for allowedHosts #3720
Conversation
) { | ||
options.allowedHosts = options.allowedHosts[0]; | ||
} | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we should also account for allowedHosts: ['host1.com', 'host2.com', 'all']
:
webpack-dev-server/lib/Server.js
Line 1516 in 8a3f0d8
if (this.options.allowedHosts === "all") { |
- if (this.options.allowedHosts === "all") {
+ if (
+ this.options.allowedHosts === "all" ||
+ (Array.isArray(this.options.allowedHosts) && this.options.allowedHosts.includes("all"))
+ ) {
What do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
all
and other hosts are mutually exclusive, I don't think there would be a use case for specifying other hosts with all 🤔 Maybe this would be the case for auto
when we need to allow localhost along with other hosts
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's hear more opinions here 👍🏻
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/cc @alexander-akait need slight attention
is this okay or should we handle 'auto' too here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will look at this in near future
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
will add tests once you confirm
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it was mistake adding auto
(because we already allow to handle from localhost/ip/etc), we should revisit this in the next major release, I will finish PR
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's add tests too
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3720 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 93.20% 93.23% +0.03%
==========================================
Files 15 15
Lines 1324 1331 +7
Branches 458 463 +5
==========================================
+ Hits 1234 1241 +7
Misses 83 83
Partials 7 7
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
For Bugs and Features; did you add new tests?
not yet, will add once this fix is validated
Motivation / Use-Case
Fix webpack/webpack-cli#2909
Breaking Changes
no
Additional Info