You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, darklaf looks nice, and MIT is a great license choice (well, Apache-2.0 might be slightly less better), however, would you please add the relevant license to the resulting jar file?
I suggest that darklaf.jar should include at least LICENSE for darklaf itself
It looks like you include bits from IntelliJ platform (judging by NOTICE.txt). I guess that NOTICE.txt must be re-distributed with binary artifacts as well.
The suggested location is META-INF/LICENSE and or META-INF/NOTICE.
PS. Having a license in META-INF/LICENSE would simplify license compliance for the projects that bundle darklaf.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, darklaf looks nice, and MIT is a great license choice (well, Apache-2.0 might be slightly less better), however, would you please add the relevant license to the resulting jar file?
For instance, https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/github/weisj/darklaf/1.3.3.4/ does not have license, so it would be a bit complicated for third-parties to comply with darklaf license.
I suggest that darklaf.jar should include at least LICENSE for darklaf itself
It looks like you include bits from IntelliJ platform (judging by NOTICE.txt). I guess that NOTICE.txt must be re-distributed with binary artifacts as well.
The suggested location is
META-INF/LICENSE
and orMETA-INF/NOTICE
.PS. Having a license in
META-INF/LICENSE
would simplify license compliance for the projects that bundledarklaf
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: