update NR difficulty #6057

cooljeanius · 2021-08-31T21:47:31Z

NR is notoriously difficult and annoying, so this PR attempts to soften it a little bit on the easier difficulties (not on HARD, though). These changes were originally made during my 1.14 playthru of NR, and haven't been tested on 1.15/1.16/1.17 yet, although I'm really dreading having to test them again... I'm leaving this marked as a draft because there are rejects files for map files that I haven't managed to wiggle back in yet, because this should really wait for until after ~~1.16~~ 1.18 is released, and because I still need to do another pass at editing/testing.

see https://github.com/cooljeanius/wesnoth_mods/tree/master/campaigns/Northern_Rebirth/diffs NB there are some rejects files that I'll have to wiggle in

there are still rejects files for maps though

minor comment movement, for fixing diff display

still trying to fix diff display

more updating of commentary for diff display purposes; hopefully this will be the final one...

cooljeanius · 2021-08-31T21:49:56Z

These changes originally come from here, btw: https://github.com/cooljeanius/wesnoth_mods/tree/master/campaigns/Northern_Rebirth/diffs

kabachuha · 2021-09-01T07:42:59Z

data/campaigns/Northern_Rebirth/scenarios/08a_Elvish_Princess.cfg

@@ -94,9 +94,13 @@
    [side]
        side=1
        controller=human
-        recruit=Thug,Poacher,Spearman,Bowman,Gryphon,Dwarvish Fighter,Dwarvish Thunderer,Dwarvish Ulfserker,Dwarvish Scout,Footpad
+        # Tallin only asked the mages for their gryphons at the end of the previous scenario, so don't add any more of their units here:
+        recruit=Thug,Poacher,Spearman,Bowman,Gryphon,Dwarvish Fighter,Dwarvish Thunderer,Dwarvish Ulfserker,Dwarvish Scout,Footpad,Fencer,Heavy Infantryman


Fencers would look really odd in the Tallin's army of former ragged peasants. I think it's better to assume that the mages kept them to themselves as personal guardsmen.

I actually initially added the fencers earlier in S06a "Old Friend", when Tallin and friends get the dwarves to forge new arms and armor for them and train them, the reasoning being that swords are newly forged, and that sometimes maps in NR get so crowded that units with skirmisher are necessary. The only reason I'm explicitly listing them in that scenario, too, is because since the recruit list is already explicitly listed there, it should at least be kept consistent with whatever units were previously added to it. If fencers don't seem ragged enough, perhaps some other unit with skirmisher could be created to fill that role instead?

@kabachuha That argument applies equally to heavy infantry as well.

@kabachuha That argument applies equally to heavy infantry as well.

My same reply about the fencers applies to heavy infantry as well, except for the part about having skirmisher

If fencers don't seem ragged enough, perhaps some other unit with skirmisher could be created to fill that role instead?

What about the outlaw rogues? They have the skirmish ability and we already have thugs and footpads on the list, so I think they fit the band.

I dunno, I don't really feel like thieves fit, though... maybe earlier in the campaign when they had less options available to them, but at this point in the campaign they have other loyalist units and should be able to forge the high-quality swords necessary for fencers to be able to use

They still have thugs, poachers and footpads for recruit though.

Fencing is not as much about the armor as about the training. I doubt Tallin's men could have mastered fencing in a couple of years the campaign takes place even if they had the best steel.

If they borrowed them from mages, one or two loyal fencer/HI units may be sufficient and not too breaking story- and gameplaywise.

How about a campaign-specific unit tree? Possibly liminal, using recolored thief sprites (different hair color), and somewhere between a Fencer and an L1 Outlaw?

Among the close-knit community of survivors, thieves had little place. However, a fighting style of nimble footwork suited some more than heavy armor, and no-one would begrudge backstabbing, when said back belonged to a orc.

How about a campaign-specific unit tree? Possibly liminal, using recolored thief sprites (different hair color), and somewhere between a Fencer and an L1 Outlaw?

Among the close-knit community of survivors, thieves had little place. However, a fighting style of nimble footwork suited some more than heavy armor, and no-one would begrudge backstabbing, when said back belonged to a orc.

That might be a good longer-term goal, but it seems a bit out-of-scope for this PR...

stevecotton · 2021-09-01T10:44:35Z

data/campaigns/Northern_Rebirth/scenarios/07a_Settling_Disputes.cfg

@@ -158,51 +160,51 @@
            {TRAIT_HEALTHY}
        [/modifications]

-        hitpoints=1
+        {QUANTITY hitpoints 3 2 1}


What's the difference between 1hp and 3hp? Both of them sound like a one-hit kill, and even the hp was raised to taking more than one hit then that would still sound like a design bug - if he's expected to survive any hits at all then there's a reliance on the RNG.

Well, even with 1hp there's a chance he'll survive.

Still, if he's expected to die, then this change does seem pointless.

maybe increase the variance a bit more, then?

I thought the purpose of it was to make the player keep him at the back for this scenario, but it's a long time since I played it.

I thought the purpose of it was to make the player keep him at the back for this scenario, but it's a long time since I played it.

Well, he's AI-controlled, and the AI retreats him anyways (has him switching between the keep for recruiting, and the nearest village for healing), so...

Having the aim is good, but the rest of your answer seems to be missing my point. You're jumping from the aim to changing numbers instead of analysing what change to make.

With that aim, maybe the analysis would be "on easy he should always survive one troll getting through his defenses", and then the numbers come from how much a strong troll could do to him in a single turn. Possibly factor into that an assumption that he'll have some turns of healing on a village between the intro and that turn, so make the hitpoints still match the idea of a lich killing him in a single attack if Tallin's group hadn't rescued him.

I think #8337 might be relevant here

I agree that 3/2/1 is not a reasonable change since it's just too minor. I'd suggest just going up at least slightly in some way (e.g. healing him after capturing the lich via event or something)

With that aim, maybe the analysis would be "on easy he should always survive one troll getting through his defenses", and then the numbers come from how much a strong troll could do to him in a single turn.

Well if I went with a troll, they do 14 damage a hit (15 if strong), which would lead to a rather drastic variance ({29 15 1}, or {31 16 1} if we're assuming the "strong" trait)... how about if instead we use the weakest unit that's pre-placed for side 3, the Young Ogre. 1 hit from a Young Ogre is 5 damage. So, {11 6 1}, then?

I went with {11 6 1} in 0149764 (untested).

knyghtmare · 2021-09-06T07:29:23Z

data/campaigns/Northern_Rebirth/scenarios/10a_Stolen_Gold.cfg

@@ -343,6 +344,14 @@
            id="Ro'Sothian"
        [/recall]

+        [recall]
+            id=Varem


Who is Varem? Player NR like 7 times over the past 10 years and I do not know this character.

one of the loyal dwarves who joins you when exploring Malifor's dungeons; really it could be any of them, but I just went with him because he's who I had available

I checked the code and he indeed does appear but the acquisition process is such that most players would not have him unless they prefer battling spiders.

If there's multiple loyal dwarves, you could just have it recall one of them at random? The recall tag can take an arbitrary filter.

If there's multiple loyal dwarves, you could just have it recall one of them at random? The recall tag can take an arbitrary filter.

That's a good idea, actually

OK, I changed it to recall an arbitrary loyal dwarf in 0149764 (untested)

cooljeanius · 2021-09-27T16:31:42Z

cross-referencing this PR against the feedback I left on the forums: https://forums.wesnoth.org/viewtopic.php?f=38&t=16993&p=660329#p660329

Pentarctagon · 2022-06-27T18:23:25Z

@cooljeanius is this still something you're pursuing?

cooljeanius · 2022-06-27T19:45:58Z

@cooljeanius is this still something you're pursuing?

yeah I intend to but it probably won't be this week though...

edit: IIRC the main thing getting in the way of me continuing with it was that merge conflict; I wish that wesnoth-map-diff tool could display the parts of maps that are causing a merge conflict, too... I guess I could just discard the changes to that map...

let's see if this fixes the merge conflict

remove some stray `^Efs`-es not in mainline

same as previous

another one of these

almost done with this file?

getting closer

cooljeanius · 2022-08-02T12:21:51Z

ok I fixed the merge conflict; the failing map-diff CI task error message is:

/home/runner/work/wesnoth/wesnoth/utils/wesnoth-map-diff/node_modules/@jimp/utils/dist/index.js:40
  throw error;
  ^

Error: The source must be a Jimp image
    at Jimp.throwError (/home/runner/work/wesnoth/wesnoth/utils/wesnoth-map-diff/node_modules/@jimp/utils/dist/index.js:33:13)
    at Jimp.composite (/home/runner/work/wesnoth/wesnoth/utils/wesnoth-map-diff/node_modules/@jimp/core/dist/composite/index.js:35:30)
    at paintMisc (/home/runner/work/wesnoth/wesnoth/utils/wesnoth-map-diff/build/paint.js:52:16)
    at /home/runner/work/wesnoth/wesnoth/utils/wesnoth-map-diff/build/paint.js:76:17
    at Object.walkthrough (/home/runner/work/wesnoth/wesnoth/utils/wesnoth-map-diff/build/tilemap.js:41:9)
    at paintTilemap (/home/runner/work/wesnoth/wesnoth/utils/wesnoth-map-diff/build/paint.js:73:21)
    at Jimp.<anonymous> (/home/runner/work/wesnoth/wesnoth/utils/wesnoth-map-diff/build/paint.js:84:9)
    at Timeout._onTimeout (/home/runner/work/wesnoth/wesnoth/utils/wesnoth-map-diff/node_modules/@jimp/core/dist/index.js:264:25)
    at listOnTimeout (node:internal/timers:559:17)
    at processTimers (node:internal/timers:502:7)
Error: Process completed with exit code 1.

@macabeus do you know anything about that?

macabeus · 2022-08-02T12:30:38Z

@cooljeanius I guess it's a bug already fixed on this PR: #6880
If it isn't a fixed bug, we'll at least have a better error message.

cooljeanius · 2022-08-10T01:40:17Z

@cooljeanius I guess it's a bug already fixed on this PR: #6880 If it isn't a fixed bug, we'll at least have a better error message.

OK @macabeus so I updated this pull request to a version where that PR is merged and now the error is:

From https://github.com/wesnoth/wesnoth
 * branch              7e32194e43f418b0621af3be297d3c60ea911c7f -> FETCH_HEAD
** Working on data/campaigns/Northern_Rebirth/maps/05a_01_The_Pursuit.map **
/home/runner/work/wesnoth/wesnoth/utils/wesnoth-map-diff/build/images.js:61
                    throw new Error(`Missing image for "^${miscCode}"`);
                          ^

Error: Missing image for "^Xo"
    at Object.getTile (/home/runner/work/wesnoth/wesnoth/utils/wesnoth-map-diff/build/images.js:61:27)
    at paintTile (/home/runner/work/wesnoth/wesnoth/utils/wesnoth-map-diff/build/paint.js:50:34)
    at /home/runner/work/wesnoth/wesnoth/utils/wesnoth-map-diff/build/paint.js:112:17
    at Object.walkthrough (/home/runner/work/wesnoth/wesnoth/utils/wesnoth-map-diff/build/tilemap.js:41:9)
    at paintTilemap (/home/runner/work/wesnoth/wesnoth/utils/wesnoth-map-diff/build/paint.js:110:21)
    at Jimp.<anonymous> (/home/runner/work/wesnoth/wesnoth/utils/wesnoth-map-diff/build/paint.js:123:9)
Error: Process completed with exit code 1.

(^Xo is the "impassable overlay", for reference)

@macabeus

some suggestions from @macabeus for trying to fix the map diff failure in wesnoth#6057 (idk if this will actually work or not)

github-actions · 2023-04-13T15:35:47Z

data/campaigns/Northern_Rebirth/maps/05a_01_The_Pursuit.map

cooljeanius · 2023-04-13T15:37:29Z

Yay, the map-diff CI task now passes! Looks like it didn't manage to upload the actual image successfully though; that's something that @macabeus and I are going to have to continue to work on... (I've seen it in a few other PRs, too...)

try adding some additional flags to curl

cooljeanius · 2023-04-17T04:25:39Z

Yay, the map-diff CI task now passes! Looks like it didn't manage to upload the actual image successfully though; that's something that @macabeus and I are going to have to continue to work on... (I've seen it in a few other PRs, too...)

Relevant part of the log:

Imgur result:
{"errors":[{"id":"legacy-api-dfc4cf849-jssvj/BYtWSpW8As-1941785","code":"429","status":"Too Many Requests","detail":"Too Many Requests"}]}

cooljeanius · 2023-05-26T08:47:53Z

blah, there's a merge conflict now... at least it's only in one file so far; if more files start having merge conflicts, I'm just going to give up on this...

Pentarctagon · 2023-05-26T22:58:18Z

What remains to be done? To be honest I'm kind of amazed that there's only been a single conflict after a year and a half.

TheShadowOfHassen · 2023-05-27T12:00:29Z

Are the conflicts because of my dialog rewriting?

cooljeanius · 2023-06-17T22:09:05Z

What remains to be done? To be honest I'm kind of amazed that there's only been a single conflict after a year and a half.

Come to some sort of agreement about Fencers and Heavy Infantrymen
Update recall filter I added for Varem to apply to any loyal dwarves instead (edit: done in 0149764, but still untested)
Another playthrough in which I retest my changes
~~Fix map-diff: change image upload location away from imgur #7557 for the map diff~~ (actually never mind)

Are the conflicts because of my dialog rewriting?

Yeah but don't worry about it; it's ok... I intend to handle it.

data/campaigns/Northern_Rebirth/scenarios/07a_Settling_Disputes.cfg

FyiurAmron · 2024-02-28T16:39:44Z

data/campaigns/Northern_Rebirth/scenarios/07a_Settling_Disputes.cfg

-            hitpoints=12
-            experience=40
+            {QUANTITY hitpoints 16 14 12}
+            {QUANTITY experience 41 40 39}


this makes him weaker on HARD

I'll have to review this one once I'm back on my computer (on mobile currently)...

So, right, an Ulfserker's max experience is 42. I can't go any higher without making him auto-advance, and I generally like to keep all 3 numbers different from one another, in a linear pattern...

@cooljeanius

I generally like to keep all 3 numbers different from one another, in a linear pattern

why? There's no need to differentiate the numbers for the sake of just being different, especially if the difference is this minuscule. It makes both maintaining a scenario a chore (more values to change on refactors etc), and, in this and many similar places, serves no actual purpose. I'd mirror what @stevecotton said before: balancing the scenario is not about having aesthetic numbers. It's about trying to find an aim first, and proposing the changes for that next.

If the unit is about to get AMLAd anyway, the HPs doesn't matter as long as it's the same amount of troll hits. Same with XP: if the unit is fighting trolls, then 40 XP and 41 XP are effectively the same, they'll either get AMLAd or killed, no other option here.

If you want to make the units able to survive more hits, you'll need to give them more than 2 HPs in this case (AFAIR, troll hits for 10-ish dam, both 12, 14 and 16 are two hits). Tweaking XP makes no sense whatsoever, with 40 XP it's just a single fight. That's why you're breaking HARD here, because 39 XP means surviving two troll combats, so it's virtually impossible and you're marking this unit to die.

@cooljeanius

I generally like to keep all 3 numbers different from one another, in a linear pattern

why? There's no need to differentiate the numbers for the sake of just being different, especially if the difference is this minuscule.

Maybe not a NEED, but it's still a want, at least.

It makes both maintaining a scenario a chore (more values to change on refactors etc), and, in this and many similar places, serves no actual purpose.

It increases replayability, though.

I'd mirror what @stevecotton said before: balancing the scenario is not about having aesthetic numbers.

I disagree, aesthetic numbers are nice.

It's about trying to find an aim first, and proposing the changes for that next.

If the unit is about to get AMLAd anyway, the HPs doesn't matter as long as it's the same amount of troll hits. Same with XP: if the unit is fighting trolls, then 40 XP and 41 XP are effectively the same, they'll either get AMLAd or killed, no other option here.

If you want to make the units able to survive more hits, you'll need to give them more than 2 HPs in this case (AFAIR, troll hits for 10-ish dam, both 12, 14 and 16 are two hits). Tweaking XP makes no sense whatsoever, with 40 XP it's just a single fight. That's why you're breaking HARD here, because 39 XP means surviving two troll combats, so it's virtually impossible and you're marking this unit to die.

Well anyways, I'm no longer breaking HARD as of 0149764 (untested).

You do realize that {QUANTITY 41 40 40} works just fine, right? Also, does 18 HP represent more hits than 12?

You do realize that {QUANTITY 41 40 40} works just fine, right?

Yeah but I don't like repeating numbers between difficulties; I prefer the ifdef method in that case (when a number would repeat otherwise)

FyiurAmron · 2024-02-28T16:41:18Z

I'm inclined to agree that some changes are really groundbreaking, while some are too minor. I think that doing this per-scenario would be a better way to handle this, this is really huge.

TheShadowOfHassen · 2024-02-28T17:49:11Z

So maybe separate the tweaks for each campaign and have a PR for each separately?

I really like the NR campaign, and I'd love to see it get a bit of a balance!

cooljeanius · 2024-02-29T19:55:57Z

data/campaigns/Northern_Rebirth/scenarios/07a_Settling_Disputes.cfg

Map diff failure here is due to at least one of cooljeanius/wesnoth-map-diff#79, #7034, and/or cooljeanius/wesnoth-map-diff#80; I'm not quite sure which...

data/campaigns/Northern_Rebirth/scenarios/07a_Settling_Disputes.cfg

put starting gold back to 0

…lager_NR_difficulty

add line for Xo.png

cooljeanius · 2024-07-30T10:11:47Z

What remains to be done? To be honest I'm kind of amazed that there's only been a single conflict after a year and a half.

Come to some sort of agreement about Fencers and Heavy Infantrymen

Update recall filter I added for Varem to apply to any loyal dwarves instead (edit: done in 0149764, but still untested)

Another playthrough in which I retest my changes

OK so I fixed the merge conflicts and got the checks passing again; I still want to get checkboxes 1 and 3 resolved before taking this out of draft mode, though... (N.B. for the 3rd checkbox, it doesn't necessarily have to be me; someone else could also test for me...)

cooljeanius added 6 commits August 31, 2021 16:51

initial attempt at applying patches from my repo

54d2c77

see https://github.com/cooljeanius/wesnoth_mods/tree/master/campaigns/Northern_Rebirth/diffs NB there are some rejects files that I'll have to wiggle in

wiggle in rejects files for scenario files

539611a

there are still rejects files for maps though

re-linearize some numerical progressions

9e2ac4d

Update 13a_Showdown.cfg

7034c80

minor comment movement, for fixing diff display

Update 13a_Showdown.cfg

a9a1e7b

still trying to fix diff display

Update 13a_Showdown.cfg

4c1b267

more updating of commentary for diff display purposes; hopefully this will be the final one...

github-actions bot added the Campaign (any) Deprecated tag, replaced with separate tags for each mainline campaign label Aug 31, 2021

cooljeanius mentioned this pull request Aug 31, 2021

open new Northern Rebirth PR upstream cooljeanius/wesnoth_mods#7

Closed

kabachuha reviewed Sep 1, 2021

View reviewed changes

stevecotton reviewed Sep 1, 2021

View reviewed changes

knyghtmare reviewed Sep 6, 2021

View reviewed changes

cooljeanius mentioned this pull request Jul 24, 2022

General map-diff improvements #6880

Merged

cooljeanius added 7 commits August 1, 2022 23:42

Update 05a_01_The_Pursuit.map

2e07d7c

let's see if this fixes the merge conflict

Update 05a_01_The_Pursuit.map

448293d

remove some stray `^Efs`-es not in mainline

Update 05a_01_The_Pursuit.map

913fd2a

same as previous

Update 05a_01_The_Pursuit.map

2f550d3

another one of these

Update 05a_01_The_Pursuit.map

3404a28

almost done with this file?

Update 05a_01_The_Pursuit.map

8f8527e

getting closer

Merge branch 'master' into egallager_NR_difficulty

c3a2c27

Merge branch 'wesnoth:master' into egallager_NR_difficulty

7e32194

Merge branch 'wesnoth:master' into egallager_NR_difficulty

f918d27

cooljeanius mentioned this pull request Oct 25, 2022

Map Diff fails if new map is added #7034

Open

cooljeanius removed the Schema label Mar 18, 2023

cooljeanius added a commit to cooljeanius/wesnoth that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2023

Update images.ts

8c7d2ff

some suggestions from @macabeus for trying to fix the map diff failure in wesnoth#6057 (idk if this will actually work or not)

Merge https://github.com/wesnoth/wesnoth into egallager_NR_difficulty

302fa3e

Update map-diff.yml

6a1f1ae

try adding some additional flags to curl

cooljeanius assigned cooljeanius and unassigned macabeus May 26, 2023

stevecotton added Campaign NR The mainline Northern Rebirth campaign and removed Campaign (any) Deprecated tag, replaced with separate tags for each mainline campaign labels Dec 8, 2023

cooljeanius mentioned this pull request Feb 17, 2024

tweak UtBS difficulty #8421

Draft

cooljeanius added the Postponed Issues which cannot be worked on at this time. label Feb 17, 2024

This was referenced Feb 28, 2024

Add a "visual novel" difficulty to Northern Rebirth #8410

Open

[NR] [07a - Settling Disputes] possibility of getting the scenario unwinnable early due to Gryphon rush #8337

Closed

FyiurAmron reviewed Feb 28, 2024

View reviewed changes

data/campaigns/Northern_Rebirth/scenarios/07a_Settling_Disputes.cfg Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

FyiurAmron reviewed Feb 28, 2024

View reviewed changes

some changes in response to feedback

0149764

cooljeanius commented Feb 29, 2024

View reviewed changes

stevecotton reviewed Mar 1, 2024

View reviewed changes

data/campaigns/Northern_Rebirth/scenarios/07a_Settling_Disputes.cfg Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

cooljeanius added 3 commits May 18, 2024 01:31

Update 07a_Settling_Disputes.cfg

d11e74e

put starting gold back to 0

Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/wesnoth/wesnoth into egal…

4d07fdc

…lager_NR_difficulty

Update copyrights.csv

1a2a91f

add line for Xo.png

update NR difficulty #6057

Are you sure you want to change the base?

update NR difficulty #6057

Conversation

cooljeanius commented Aug 31, 2021 • edited Loading

cooljeanius commented Aug 31, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

kabachuha Sep 4, 2021 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

stevecotton Sep 4, 2021 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

cooljeanius Feb 29, 2024 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

cooljeanius commented Sep 27, 2021

Pentarctagon commented Jun 27, 2022

cooljeanius commented Jun 27, 2022 • edited Loading

cooljeanius commented Aug 2, 2022

macabeus commented Aug 2, 2022

cooljeanius commented Aug 10, 2022 • edited Loading

github-actions bot commented Apr 13, 2023 • edited Loading

data/campaigns/Northern_Rebirth/maps/05a_01_The_Pursuit.map

cooljeanius commented Apr 13, 2023

cooljeanius commented Apr 17, 2023

cooljeanius commented May 26, 2023

Pentarctagon commented May 26, 2023

TheShadowOfHassen commented May 27, 2023

cooljeanius commented Jun 17, 2023 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

FyiurAmron Feb 29, 2024 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

CelticMinstrel Mar 1, 2024 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

cooljeanius Mar 1, 2024 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

FyiurAmron commented Feb 28, 2024

TheShadowOfHassen commented Feb 28, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

cooljeanius commented Jul 30, 2024 • edited Loading

cooljeanius commented Aug 31, 2021 •

edited

Loading

kabachuha Sep 4, 2021 •

edited

Loading

stevecotton Sep 4, 2021 •

edited

Loading

cooljeanius Feb 29, 2024 •

edited

Loading

cooljeanius commented Jun 27, 2022 •

edited

Loading

cooljeanius commented Aug 10, 2022 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Apr 13, 2023 •

edited

Loading

cooljeanius commented Jun 17, 2023 •

edited

Loading

FyiurAmron Feb 29, 2024 •

edited

Loading

CelticMinstrel Mar 1, 2024 •

edited

Loading

cooljeanius Mar 1, 2024 •

edited

Loading

cooljeanius commented Jul 30, 2024 •

edited

Loading