Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Help wanted: Testing with Nexys4 DDR (or Nexys A7-100T) appreciated #16

Closed
wfjm opened this issue Feb 1, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed
Assignees

Comments

@wfjm
Copy link
Owner

wfjm commented Feb 1, 2019

The w11a design for Nexys4 DDR, see rtl/sys_gen/w11a/nexys4d, was provided to support also an up-to-date Nexys4 board. It is so far only simulation tested.

Testing done with a real Nexyx4 DDR, or a newer Nexys A7-100T, would be highly appreciated. Please double check the pin assignments (see mig_a.prj and nexys4d*.xdc) with the documentation of your board to avoid potential damage.

Looking forward to receive test reports.

@wfjm wfjm self-assigned this Aug 2, 2019
@wfjm
Copy link
Owner Author

wfjm commented Aug 10, 2019

The Nexys4 (classic, with 16 MByte PSRAM) board on which most of the recent w11 was done broke in late July 2019 (see blog) and a Nexys A7 was ordered as replacement.

Basic tests with the test designs sys_tst_serloop2 and sys_tst_rlink_n4d and the BRAM-only w11 design sys_w11a_br_n4d worked fine.

But all tests involving the DDR2 memory interface failed. The culprit was quickly found, it was a mistake in the MIG configuration mig_a.prj, the polarity of the SYS_RST signal was ACTIVE LOW instead of ACTIVE HIGH. After fixing this, the test designs sys_tst_mig_n4d and sys_tst_sram_n4d as well as the w11 implementation sys_w11a_n4d worked right away.

The tst_sram designs show nicely that the DDR2 on the Nexys A7 board is slightly slower than the DDR3 on the Arty A7 board

   Board     test time   clock period     UI_CLK
  Nexys A7     37.36 s        3333 ps   75.0 MHz 
  Arty A7      35.77 s        3000 ps   83.3 MHz

The issue is closed with commit 563e230.

@wfjm wfjm closed this as completed Aug 10, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant