Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Be more selective with handing out the internal response #1661

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 28, 2023

Conversation

annevk
Copy link
Member

@annevk annevk commented May 25, 2023

Upon reviewing #1645 again it struck me that the first argument to processResponseConsumeBody should not be the internal response. The caller would still have all the same capabilities when it's not and it's safer if it's not.


Preview | Diff

Upon reviewing #1645 again it struck me that the first argument to processResponseConsumeBody should not be the internal response. The caller would still have all the same capabilities when it's not and it's safer if it's not.
Copy link
Contributor

@noamr noamr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@noamr noamr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@annevk annevk merged commit b5a587b into main May 28, 2023
@annevk annevk deleted the annevk/fetch-handover-internal-response-take-2 branch May 28, 2023 14:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants