[e] (0) Be less judgmental about certain encodings... (bug 6858)

git-svn-id: http://svn.whatwg.org/webapps@3341 340c8d12-0b0e-0410-8428-c7bf67bfef74

index

@@ -1711,11 +1711,12 @@ a.<a href=#dom-uda-protocol title=dom-uda-protocol>protocol</a> = 'https'; // ch
   correspond to single-byte sequences that map to the same Unicode
   characters as those bytes in ANSI_X3.4-1968 (US-ASCII). <a href=#refsRFC1345>[RFC1345]</a></p>
 
-  <p class=note>This includes such exotic encodings as Shift_JIS and
-  variants of ISO-2022, even though it is possible for bytes like 0x70
-  to be part of longer sequences that are unrelated to their
-  interpretation as ASCII. It excludes such encodings as UTF-7,
-  UTF-8+names, UTF-16, HZ-GB-2312, GSM03.38, and EBCDIC variants.</p>
+  <p class=note>This includes such encodings as Shift_JIS and
+  variants of ISO-2022, even though it is possible in this encodings
+  for bytes like 0x70 to be part of longer sequences that are
+  unrelated to their interpretation as ASCII. It excludes such
+  encodings as UTF-7, UTF-16, HZ-GB-2312, GSM03.38, and EBCDIC
+  variants.</p>
 
   <!--
    We'll have to change that if anyone comes up with a way to have a

source

@@ -735,11 +735,12 @@ a.<span title="dom-uda-protocol">protocol</span> = 'https'; // change just the s
   characters as those bytes in ANSI_X3.4-1968 (US-ASCII). <a
   href="#refsRFC1345">[RFC1345]</a></p>
 
-  <p class="note">This includes such exotic encodings as Shift_JIS and
-  variants of ISO-2022, even though it is possible for bytes like 0x70
-  to be part of longer sequences that are unrelated to their
-  interpretation as ASCII. It excludes such encodings as UTF-7,
-  UTF-8+names, UTF-16, HZ-GB-2312, GSM03.38, and EBCDIC variants.</p>
+  <p class="note">This includes such encodings as Shift_JIS and
+  variants of ISO-2022, even though it is possible in this encodings
+  for bytes like 0x70 to be part of longer sequences that are
+  unrelated to their interpretation as ASCII. It excludes such
+  encodings as UTF-7, UTF-16, HZ-GB-2312, GSM03.38, and EBCDIC
+  variants.</p>
 
   <!--
    We'll have to change that if anyone comes up with a way to have a