-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 196
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Json: support unsafe schema validation #3788
Labels
🛠️ compiler
Compiler
good first issue
Good for newcomers
📜 lang-spec-impl
Appears in the language spec roadmap
Milestone
Comments
hasanaburayyan
added
📜 lang-spec-impl
Appears in the language spec roadmap
🛠️ compiler
Compiler
labels
Aug 11, 2023
This was referenced Aug 11, 2023
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 12, 2023
The changes in this PR make it possible to call `fromJson` on any compatible struct definition. ## Implementation notes: Previously we treated the jsification of structs as a no-op since there is not a JS equivalent. So with this change structs now JSify into a `Struct` file that contains a class with a static `jsonSchema` and a `fromJson` function which will allow for field validation at runtime. The schema generated adheres to: https://json-schema.org/understanding-json-schema/ take this simple example Wing code: ```js struct MyStruct { myField: str; myOtherField: num; } ``` this will now generate a JS file named `MyStruct.Struct.js` which looks like this: ```js module.exports = function(stdStruct, fromInline) { class MyStruct { static jsonSchema() { return { id: "/MyStruct", type: "object", properties: { myField: { type: "string" }, myOtherField: { type: "number" }, }, required: [ "myField", "myOtherField", ], $defs: { } } } static fromJson(obj) { return stdStruct._validate(obj, this.jsonSchema()) } static _toInflightType(context) { return fromInline(`require("./MyStruct.Struct.js")(${ context._lift(stdStruct) })`); } } return MyStruct; }; ``` The piece that brings this all together is the addition of the `Struct` class in our std that only has a `fromJson()` methods at the moment that is a Wing macro. The macro just calls the `fromJson()` method in the generated javascript. ### Misc We want to stop the user at compile time from calling `fromJson` on a struct that cannot be represented by a Json value ie ```js struct MyStruct { b: cloud.Bucket; } let j = {}; MyStruct.fromJson(j); ``` to prevent this I added a check in the typechecker for structs to confirm that if `fromJson` is called that all the fields in the struct are valid for conversion attempt See image below for error when attempting: <img width="664" alt="image" src="https://github.com/winglang/wing/assets/45375125/785a2fa6-8823-4fa2-aaa5-4bc8f7ed597f"> Closes: #3653 Closes: #3139 ## TODO: - [x] separate the work done here and the remaining work into different tickets. - [x] update language reference ## Followup issues that are out of scope for this PR: - #3792 - #3790 - #3789 - #3788 ## Checklist - [x] Title matches [Winglang's style guide](https://www.winglang.io/contributing/start-here/pull_requests#how-are-pull-request-titles-formatted) - [x] Description explains motivation and solution - [x] Tests added (always) - [x] Docs updated (only required for features) - [x] Added `pr/e2e-full` label if this feature requires end-to-end testing *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the [Wing Cloud Contribution License](https://github.com/winglang/wing/blob/main/CONTRIBUTION_LICENSE.md)*.
@hasanaburayyan thanks for opening these issues to track on our language roadmap. On top of marking them with the |
5 tasks
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 29, 2023
Add support for using `unsafe: true` when calling `fromJson()` methods Closes: #3788 ## Checklist - [x] Title matches [Winglang's style guide](https://www.winglang.io/contributing/start-here/pull_requests#how-are-pull-request-titles-formatted) - [x] Description explains motivation and solution - [x] Tests added (always) - [x] Docs updated (only required for features) - [x] Added `pr/e2e-full` label if this feature requires end-to-end testing *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the [Wing Cloud Contribution License](https://github.com/winglang/wing/blob/main/CONTRIBUTION_LICENSE.md)*.
Congrats! 🚀 This was released in Wing 0.34.2. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
🛠️ compiler
Compiler
good first issue
Good for newcomers
📜 lang-spec-impl
Appears in the language spec roadmap
The following sections need to be added to language reference:
1.1.4.5 Schema validation (append)
Use
unsafe: true
to disable this check at your own risk (P2):1.1.4.7 Assignment to user-defined structs (append)
Same as with primitives and containers, it is possible to opt-out of validation using
unsafe: true
:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: