Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Invisibly return the data.frame in assert_commands #12

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 11, 2017

Conversation

kendonB
Copy link
Contributor

@kendonB kendonB commented Apr 11, 2017

This way, I can build my own commands using data.frame making commands I'm comfortable with (i.e. tribble instead of commands_batch) and check they're OK in a pipe.

This way, I can build my own commands using data.frame making commands I'm comfortable with (i.e. tribble instead of commands_batch) and check they're OK in a pipe.
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #12 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##           master    #12   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage     100%   100%           
=====================================
  Files           6      6           
  Lines         147    148    +1     
=====================================
+ Hits          147    148    +1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
R/utils.R 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 60e85f5...9f6e8c9. Read the comment docs.

@wlandau
Copy link
Owner

wlandau commented Apr 11, 2017

Thanks, Kendon! Feel free to add yourself as a contributor in the DESCRIPTION. If you make a pull request for that, I will accept it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants