Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wavelength #43

Open
ejwelton opened this issue Apr 8, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Wavelength #43

ejwelton opened this issue Apr 8, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
discussion needed Issue needs further discussion within the team

Comments

@ejwelton
Copy link

ejwelton commented Apr 8, 2021

Branch

Summary and Purpose
There is currently no way to specify the wavelength of optical observations (as from remote sensing). The Frequencies feature type exists in WMDR with appropriate descriptors. However, units of frequency are not adequate for observations in the UV-VIS-NIR spectrum due to the significant digits required for accuracy (and units of nanometer or micrometer are standard).

Stakeholder(s)
lidar and other remote sensing

Proposal
A new Wavelengths feature type be created, modeled after Frequencies:

Wavelengths feature type:

  • bandwidth
  • bandwidthUnit (expected values are nanometer and micrometer)
  • wavelength
  • wavelengthUnit (expected values are nanometer and micrometer)
  • wavelengthUse
  • purposeOfWavelengthUse
  • transmissionMode

This proposal requires that nanometer and micrometer (and/or micron) be added to the measurement unit code registry (they are currently missing).

Reason
These proposed changes will provide a way for users to specify the wavelength of their observations. Such information is critical for remote sensing data.

@fstuerzl
Copy link
Member

@ejwelton, I think, this issue needs to be moved to the wmds repository (see wmo-im/wmds#269).

@ejwelton
Copy link
Author

@fstuerzl, I created this issue in wmdr, not wmds, at the suggestion of @joergklausen. Please discuss this with him, I'm not sure which location is better to address the issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discussion needed Issue needs further discussion within the team
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants