Closes #6807 Changed link for rucss display notice

[Khadreal]

Description

Fixes #6807

Documentation

Update the support link for when RUCSS db is not created.

User documentation

Explain how this code impacts users.

Technical documentation

Explain how this code works. Diagram & drawings are welcomed.

Type of change

• Enhancement (non-breaking change which improves an existing functionality).

New dependencies

List any new dependencies that are required for this change.

Risks

List possible performance & security issues or risks, and explain how they have been mitigated.

Checklists

Feature validation

• I validated all the Acceptance Criteria. If possible, provide sreenshots or videos.
• I triggered all changed lines of code at least once without new errors/warnings/notices.
• I implemented built-in tests to cover the new/changed code.

Documentation

• I prepared the user documentation for the feature/enhancement and shared it in the PR or the GitHub issue.
• The user documentation covers new/changed entry points (endpoints, WP hooks, configuration files, ...).
• I prepared the technical documentation if needed, and shared it in the PR or the GitHub issue.

Code style

• I wrote self-explanatory code about what it does.
• I wrote comments to explain why it does it.
• I named variables and functions explicitely.
• I protected entry points against unexpected inputs.
• I did not introduce unecessary complexity.
• I listed the introduced external dependencies explicitely on the PR.
• I validated the repo-specific guidelines from CONTRIBUTING.md.

Observability

• I handled errors when needed.
•  I wrote user-facing messages that are understandable and provide actionable feedbacks.
• I prepared ways to observe the implemented system (logs, data, etc.).

Risks

•  I explicitely mentioned performance risks in the PR.
• I explicitely mentioned security risks in the PR.

[codacy-production]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
Report missing for 612980f1	✅ 76.92% (target: 50.00%)

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (612980f)	Report Missing	Report Missing	Report Missing
Head commit (23d8c47)	37351	14554	38.97%

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#6815)	13	10	76.92%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

---

_{🚀 Don’t miss a bit, follow what’s new on Codacy.}

_{Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more}

Footnotes

1. Codacy didn't receive coverage data for the commit, or there was an error processing the received data. Check your integration for errors and validate that your coverage setup is correct. ↩

[MathieuLamiot]

@Khadreal If this is NoQA, can this be moved to QA Done then? We would only need you to simply validate the banner is OK manually.

[Khadreal]

Screenshot

See bottom left for the link when you hover on the our support text

[piotrbak]

@Khadreal Good catch, we could change it to:
Please check our documentation and the documentation should be underlined link.

[Khadreal]

Updated screenshot

cc @piotrbak

[Khadreal]

@piotrbak please can we get the french translation of the text so I can update the PO file

[remyperona]

French translation is done via Transifex later on, no need to do it in PR.