fix(deps): bump dessant/support-requests from 2 to 3

[dependabot]

Bumps dessant/support-requests from 2 to 3.

Release notes

Sourced from dessant/support-requests's releases.

v3.0.0

Learn more about this release from the changelog.

v2.1.2

Learn more about this release from the changelog.

v2.1.1

Learn more about this release from the changelog.

v2.1.0

Learn more about this release from the changelog.

v2.0.1

Learn more about this release from the changelog.

Changelog

Sourced from dessant/support-requests's changelog.

2.1.2 (2021-10-02)

2.1.1 (2021-07-09)

Bug Fixes

• update GitHub API calls (fa1e92b)

2.1.0 (2021-07-09)

Features

• default github-token to github.token (#7) (731cce0)
• document the use of personal access tokens (6ba0377)

Bug Fixes

• declare required permissions (692a08a)
• lock temporarily unlocked issues even after an error (182adbd)

2.0.1 (2021-01-01)

Bug Fixes

• update dependencies (f502ca6)

2.0.0 (2020-08-24)

⚠ BREAKING CHANGES

• The deployment method and configuration options have changed.

Features

• move to GitHub Actions (4777aa0)

1.0.1 (2019-10-25)

Bug Fixes

• update dependencies (7372f4f)

1.0.0 (2019-06-10)

... (truncated)

Commits

• b1303ca chore(release): 3.0.0
• d40910d fix: update docs
• 12a7f0c chore: update workflow
• 6b0c3a2 chore: update package
• 98a49e5 fix: update dependencies
• See full diff in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
• @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
• @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

[dependabot]

Dependabot tried to add @GregoireF and @NicolasV as reviewers to this PR, but received the following error from GitHub:

POST https://api.github.com/repos/wr-projects/cz-changelog-wrprojects/pulls/177/requested_reviewers: 422 - Reviews may only be requested from collaborators. One or more of the users or teams you specified is not a collaborator of the wr-projects/cz-changelog-wrprojects repository. // See: https://docs.github.com/rest/reference/pulls#request-reviewers-for-a-pull-request

[pull-request-quantifier-deprecated]

This PR has 2 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

---

Quantification details

Label      : Extra Small
Size       : +1 -1
Percentile : 0.8%

Total files changed: 1

Change summary by file extension:
.yml : +1 -1

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

• Fast and predictable releases to production:
  • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
    iterations.
  • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
• Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
  • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
  • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
• Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
  • Small portions can be assimilated better.
• Better engineering practices are exercised:
  • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
  • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

• Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
  • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
  • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
• Change your engineering behaviors
  • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
    • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
    • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

• One line was added: +1 -0
• One line was deleted: +0 -1
• One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
  interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
• Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
  of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

---

Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}