-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Declare breaking and non-breaking symbols #15
Comments
Is this more than one equation? Note that, although I think the syntax is rather verbose, breqn asks for each separate equation to be placed into separate |
These two alternatives would be fine: \begin{align*}
\phi =& \exists x \in M. \\
& \exists y \in M. \\
& \psi
\end{align*}
\begin{align*}
\phi =& \exists x \in M. \\
& \quad \exists y \in M. \\
& \qquad \psi
\end{align*} I simply want to avoid breaking formulas at |
I think here the issue isn't so much to globally stop breaks on \in but rather to mark the subterm with the type judgement as something on which not to break, if you do
Then you get a much better layout from breqn. |
@davidcarlisle, thanks for the advice, but the formula you suggested does allow breaking at all. The problem is that \begin{dmath*}
\phi = \exists {x \in M}. \exists {x \in M}. \exists {x \in M}. \exists {x \in M}. \exists {x \in M}. \exists {x \in M}.\exists {x \in M}.\exists {x \in M}.\exists {x \in M}.\exists {x \in M}.\exists {x \in M}.\exists {x \in M}.\exists {x \in M}.\exists {x \in M}.\exists {x \in M}. \psi
\end{dmath*} |
You can declare a breakable . by making it a binary operator (probably other ways too but \mathbin seems OK for this usage)
it doesn't really capture the semantic nesting though |
yes I was going to comment on that, I'd need to check flexisym to see if On 14 July 2016 at 15:23, Sven Keidel notifications@github.com wrote:
|
Oh, I see, but thanks for the help anyway. |
On 15 Jul 2016, at 12:08 AM, David Carlisle notifications@github.com wrote:
Would you like write access? :) Cheers, |
So, @wspr, @davidcarlisle, how can I declare the dot to be a breaking symbol without appearing at the beginning of the next line? |
@svenkeidel possibly like this
which makes |
How can I specify that a relation symbol is not available for breaking inside a formula? Furthermore, how can I specify that the punction
.
can be used as a breaking symbol?Ideally I would like to write something like this:
Here is a minimal example formula that is indented weirdly:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: