Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ramda@0.22.1 untested ⚠️ #13

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 13, 2016
Merged

ramda@0.22.1 untested ⚠️ #13

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 13, 2016

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello lovely humans,

ramda just published its new version 0.22.1.

State No tests ⚠️
Dependency ramda
New version 0.22.1
Type dependency

This version is covered by your current version range, but I could not detect automated tests for this project. Without a test suite I can not really tell whether your project still works.

I was looking at the latest commit of your default branch, but GitHub said there is no status attached to it.

Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.

Good luck with your project ✨

You rock!

🌴


The new version differs by 2 commits .

  • c592e68 Version 0.22.1
  • a01ffe6 'fix' internal jsdoc comments that were choking the docs build (#1855)

See the full diff.


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? ⚡ greenkeeper upgrade

@wuct wuct force-pushed the greenkeeper-ramda-0.22.1 branch 2 times, most recently from 0bb652c to cbcb996 Compare August 13, 2016 03:22
@wuct wuct merged commit eaf9aa2 into master Aug 13, 2016
@wuct wuct deleted the greenkeeper-ramda-0.22.1 branch August 13, 2016 03:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants