Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New data set dat.barone2019, added data tests, added concepts to documentation, fixed typos #5

Merged
merged 35 commits into from
Sep 17, 2019

Conversation

kylehamilton
Copy link
Collaborator

Adds new data set #3
Citation
Barone, P., Corradi, G., & Gomila, A. (2019). Infants’ performance in spontaneous-response false belief tasks: A review and meta-analysis. Infant Behavior and Development, 57, 101350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2019.101350

OSF
https://osf.io/re8uj/?view_only=d2605771dd664831a104318db9ff7aa9

Fixes minor typo that threw a warning during package build #4
Changed three cases of \italic into \emph

Update to current wviechtb version
Added dat.barone2019 and fixed a typo in dat.ho2012
Checks to see if an rma.uni object can be made then checks the results to make sure it was done correctly
added tests for dat.bangertdrowns2004 and dat.begg1989
@kylehamilton kylehamilton changed the title New data set dat.barone2019 and fixed minor typos in dat.ho2012 New data set dat.barone2019, added data tests, fixed typos Sep 14, 2019
@kylehamilton
Copy link
Collaborator Author

To address one of the tasks on the todo list (#1) I've added a couple of tests for dat.bangertdrowns2004, dat.barone2019, and dat.begg1989 to make sure the data in metadat produces the right results in metafor. If you like this @wviechtb I'll do the rest of them over the coming month or so, if you don't like it then just remove the tests in the pull request. I have no idea what I'm doing so I just guessed at what I thought was a good set of tests. I just copied the analysis provided in the documentation but I did not cross-reference it with what was published in the articles if we need to do that I can add it to my list.

adding feild of study for each data file
@kylehamilton kylehamilton changed the title New data set dat.barone2019, added data tests, fixed typos New data set dat.barone2019, added data tests, added concepts to documentation, fixed typos Sep 15, 2019
Finished adding the base level of academic fields to all of the documentation
Concept added to documentation
For data that was in metafor I moved the tests over to metadat and changed the tests I wrote for the other datasets to match the correct format
For data that was in metafor I moved the tests over to metadat and changed the tests I wrote for the other datasets to match the correct format
Data testing now checks md5 hash, data dimensions, and data types.
Updated data testing. Data testing now checks md5 hash, data dimensions, and data types.
forgot to do this
dat.barone2019.Rd and dat.lim2014.Rd had example over 100 chr long. Also dat.pritz1997.Rd throws erros so it is set to \dontrun
Added Tests Fixed Travis and Codecov
@kylehamilton
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I have made way too many changes for one pull request. In the future I will not do this, I got a little carried away.

We need to discuss the testing issue, so removing tests for now.
We need to discuss the testing issue, so removing tests for now.
We need to discuss the testing issue, so removing tests for now.
We need to discuss the testing issue, so removing tests for now.
We need to discuss the testing issue, so removing tests for now.
We need to discuss the testing issue, so removing tests for now.
We need to discuss the testing issue, so removing tests for now.
We need to discuss the testing issue, so removing tests for now.
We need to discuss the testing issue, so removing tests for now.
We need to discuss the testing issue, so removing tests for now.
We need to discuss the testing issue, so removing tests for now.
@wviechtb wviechtb merged commit 010139d into wviechtb:master Sep 17, 2019
@wviechtb
Copy link
Owner

Thanks! I threw out all the tests (for now). We need to discuss first whether we want to go that direction.

@wviechtb wviechtb mentioned this pull request Sep 17, 2019
wviechtb pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2019
Merge pull request #5 from kylehamilton/master
kylehamilton added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants