Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Problem loading federated files #292

Closed
jefersonpa opened this issue Jul 29, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Problem loading federated files #292

jefersonpa opened this issue Jul 29, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@jefersonpa
Copy link

Hi, i have a problem with 2 models, when adding both to the same project it only displays 1.

For example, in XbimXplorer the files look like this:
image

But, it looks like this when opening in XbimWebUI:
image

Does anyone know how I can solve this?
Thanks in advance

Minimal code (or steps) to reproduce the issue:

viewer.load("tests/data/R01.wexbim");
viewer.load("tests/data/R02.wexbim");

Minimal file to reproduce the issue:

IFC and WEXBIM files

@pml1711
Copy link

pml1711 commented Jan 8, 2021

@jefersonpa did you find a way to "fix" this? I am facing a similar problem. In my case, the Revit files and the IFCs exported from the Revit files are processed/rendered in the same way in Solibri and Xbim Explorer. But in XbimWebUI one overlaps the other, it is like if they had the same origin point. And I have no idea if it is a bug, it seems like though because every other IFC viewer renders "correctly"

Revit 2021
image

XbimExplorer
image

Solibri
image

XbimWebUI
image

IFC n wexbim files -->
ifc-wexbim files.zip

@martin1cerny
Copy link
Member

There is an optional argument in when creating the wexBIM file. By default it doesn't consider large site displacement to keep coordinates smaller for better rendering quality. But you can also supply your own origin (same for both files) which will make them aligned.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants