Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CP-28924: Declare thin provisioning capability for file based SRs #404

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 4, 2018

Conversation

stefanopanella
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: Thomas Mckelvey thomas.mckelvey@citrix.com

Copy link
Contributor Author

@stefanopanella stefanopanella left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 3, 2018

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 33.616% when pulling b4e7b0c on feature/req488/master into 1aea406 on master.

@MarkSymsCtx
Copy link
Contributor

This change doesn't include a matching change to EXTSR, also it looks like THIN_PROVISIONING is actually being interpreted as OVER_COMMIT and that might be clearer. Whether ext should be able to over commit or not is a separate question given that it's not straightforward to extend the SR on local ext.

@MarkSymsCtx MarkSymsCtx self-requested a review October 4, 2018 09:24
@stefanopanella
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks Mark for spotting that, we have just discussed with Robert that it would make sense to do same thing for local ext just because THIN_PROVISIONING is a hint to XenCenter that there is no need to check for the available space in the SR since the VDI will just grow on demand. I will send an updated patch including ext SR.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Mckelvey <thomas.mckelvey@citrix.com>
@stefanopanella
Copy link
Contributor Author

Updated patch to include EXTSR.py

Copy link
Contributor

@MarkSymsCtx MarkSymsCtx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@MarkSymsCtx MarkSymsCtx merged commit 4330444 into master Oct 4, 2018
@MarkSymsCtx MarkSymsCtx deleted the feature/req488/master branch November 28, 2018 16:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants