Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Link just qcheck-core, not qcheck #5685

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 12, 2024

Conversation

edwintorok
Copy link
Contributor

qcheck is in the wrong part of xs-opam currently, and although we're moving it this test really only needs qcheck-core, so link only that to fix an internal CI failure.

qcheck is in the wrong part of xs-opam currently, and although we're moving it
this test really only needs qcheck-core, so link only that to fix an internal CI failure.

Signed-off-by: Edwin Török <edwin.torok@cloud.com>
@edwintorok
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fixes a koji build failure resulted from merging #5682

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #5685   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    51.3%   51.4%           
======================================
  Files          13      13           
  Lines        1927    1928    +1     
======================================
+ Hits          990     991    +1     
  Misses        937     937           
Flag Coverage Δ
python3.11 51.4% <ø> (+<0.1%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@psafont
Copy link
Member

psafont commented Jun 12, 2024

Can you define the package for the test as well? (and double-check the opam metadata as well)

@edwintorok
Copy link
Contributor Author

edwintorok commented Jun 12, 2024

wsproxy has already defined one on qcheck, so we're probably not doing something right when we prepare xs-opam, because that should've resulted in a failed dependency (but I think we solve packages, and then rm the ones in extra in the spec file?

I fixed up the 2 opam files to have the correct dependencies now.

ocaml/libs/sexpr/test/dune Show resolved Hide resolved
wsproxy.opam Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Edwin Török <edwin.torok@cloud.com>
@psafont psafont merged commit 65dc11e into xapi-project:master Jun 12, 2024
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants