-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 67
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support creating foreign key constraints on the create table operation #79
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8a0635f
Add example for create table with foreign key
andrew-farries cc108be
Add tests for creating tables with FKs
andrew-farries 90a3bcf
Support `References` field on columns
andrew-farries 0233730
Disallow FKs when creating new columns
andrew-farries File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ | ||
{ | ||
"name": "19_create_orders_table", | ||
"operations": [ | ||
{ | ||
"create_table": { | ||
"name": "orders", | ||
"columns": [ | ||
{ | ||
"name": "id", | ||
"type": "serial", | ||
"pk": true | ||
}, | ||
{ | ||
"name": "user_id", | ||
"type": "integer", | ||
"references": { | ||
"table": "users", | ||
"column": "id" | ||
} | ||
}, | ||
{ | ||
"name": "quantity", | ||
"type": "int" | ||
} | ||
] | ||
} | ||
} | ||
] | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder if we should make this part of the column definition or the table. The reason is that foreign keys can also be a constraint at the table level, and they can reference several columns instead of just one.
I guess we are fine with this for now and we can allow foreign key definition at the table level later? It would definitely be needed to support multi column foreign keys
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've created #81 to track multi-column foreign keys.