Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add skip_branch_with_pr: true to AppVeyor config #885

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 23, 2023

Conversation

pont-us
Copy link
Member

@pont-us pont-us commented Aug 23, 2023

This should disable branch builds for branches with a PR (since they have a PR build anyway).

Addresses #884.

Checklist:

  • Add unit tests and/or doctests in docstrings
  • Add docstrings and API docs for any new/modified user-facing classes and functions
  • New/modified features documented in docs/source/*
  • Changes documented in CHANGES.md
  • GitHub CI passes
  • AppVeyor CI passes
  • Test coverage remains or increases (target 100%)

This should disable branch builds for branches with a PR (since
they have a PR build anyway).

Addresses #884.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 23, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (4353423) 93.23% compared to head (61cd549) 93.23%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #885   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.23%   93.23%           
=======================================
  Files         443      443           
  Lines       34552    34552           
=======================================
  Hits        32213    32213           
  Misses       2339     2339           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@AliceBalfanz AliceBalfanz merged commit 22eaa79 into master Aug 23, 2023
5 checks passed
@AliceBalfanz AliceBalfanz deleted the pont-884-appveyor-pr-builds branch August 23, 2023 13:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants