Merge pull request #173 from dietmarw/proofReading

Proof reading

Author: mtiller

text/source/behavior/arrays/declarations.rst

@@ -101,6 +101,6 @@ Booleans
 It is also possible to declare an array where a dimension is specified
 as ``Boolean``, *e.g.,*
 
-.. math::
+.. code-block:: modelica
 
     Real x[Boolean];

text/source/behavior/arrays/functions.rst

@@ -201,6 +201,9 @@ Conversion Functions
 The following functions provide a means to transform arrays into other
 arrays.
 
+.. todo:: It would be nice to get examples for each function call in
+          order to be able to understand.
+
 ``scalar``
 ~~~~~~~~~~
 

text/source/behavior/discrete/bouncing.rst

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ where the time of the event is known *a priori*, a state event depends
 on the solution trajectory.  So we cannot entirely avoid the
 "searching" for the point at which the event occurs.
 
-To see a state even in action, let us consider the behavior of a
+To see a state event in action, let us consider the behavior of a
 bouncing ball bouncing on a flat horizontal surface.  When the ball is
 above the surface, it accelerates due to gravitational forces.  When
 the ball eventually comes in contact with the surface, it bounces off

text/source/behavior/discrete/hysteresis.rst

@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ temperature you have specified.  Instead, it waits until the
 temperature gets some specified amount above or below the desired
 temperature before acting.
 
-..todo: there seems to be a formatting problem around code{ChatteringControl}
+.. todo:: there seems to be a formatting problem around code{ChatteringControl}
 
 This "band" that is introduced around the desired temperature is
 called hysteresis.  The problem with the \code{ChatteringControl}
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ heater turning on and the heater turning off.
 The logic for implementing hysteresis can be made slightly more
 explicit by using an ``algorithm`` section (as previous discussed
 during our discussion on :ref:`speed estimation techniques
-<pulse-counting>`).  
+<pulse-counting>`).
 
 .. literalinclude:: /ModelicaByExample/DiscreteBehavior/Hysteresis/HysteresisControlWithAlgorithms.mo
    :language: modelica

text/source/behavior/discrete/measuring.rst

@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ Let's take a close look at the ``when`` statement in this model:
 
 .. literalinclude:: /ModelicaByExample/DiscreteBehavior/SpeedMeasurement/IntervalMeasure.mo
    :language: modelica
-   :lines: 13-18
+   :lines: 13-19
 
 Here, we use the vector expression syntax used previously in the
 :ref:`bouncing-ball` example.  Recall that the ``when`` statement

text/source/behavior/discrete/switching.rst

@@ -27,11 +27,12 @@ equations.
 
 We can see the voltage response of this model to the switched supply
 voltage in the following plot:
-.. todo:: Source Voltage V needs subscript s, other plots missing subscripts also
 
 .. plot:: ../plots/SRLCv.py
    :class: interactive
 
+.. todo:: Source Voltage V needs subscript s, other plots missing subscripts also
+
 Furthermore, we can see the current response for inductor, resistor
 and capacitor components in this plot:
 

text/source/behavior/discrete/when.rst

@@ -121,9 +121,10 @@ initialization phase to determine initial conditions, just like an
 ``initial equation`` section, but the ``initial algorithm`` section
 will allow multiple assignments to the same variable.  The same
 caveats apply with respect to symbolic manipulation.
-.. todo:: what would be the purpose in having multiple assignments to the same variable?is the order important like in non-initial algorithm sections where
-the last assigment is the one used?
-for any algorithm section (initial or otherwise):
-are the statements executed sequentially so that
-x = 2; y = x; z = y is well defined?
 
+.. todo:: what would be the purpose in having multiple assignments to
+          the same variable?is the order important like in non-initial
+          algorithm sections where the last assigment is the one used?
+          for any algorithm section (initial or otherwise):
+          are the statements executed sequentially so that
+          x = 2; y = x; z = y is well defined?