Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lossless cl #34

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Aug 18, 2017
Merged

Lossless cl #34

merged 7 commits into from
Aug 18, 2017

Conversation

CJ-Wright
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Aug 7, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #34 into master will increase coverage by 0.09%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master     #34      +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage    98.2%   98.3%   +0.09%     
=========================================
  Files           6       6              
  Lines        1227    1299      +72     
=========================================
+ Hits         1205    1277      +72     
  Misses         22      22
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
shed/event_streams.py 96.38% <100%> (+0.28%) ⬆️
shed/tests/test_streams.py 99.47% <100%> (+0.02%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 0e56571...0ec2453. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@jrmlhermitte jrmlhermitte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

EDIT : wrong window, sorry... I will get to this a little later in the day...

@CJ-Wright
Copy link
Member Author

Its ok this will most likely get refactored after the homogeneous version goes in

@CJ-Wright CJ-Wright merged commit 7298708 into xpdAcq:master Aug 18, 2017
@CJ-Wright CJ-Wright deleted the lossless_cl branch August 18, 2017 04:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants