You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The ordinary policy pattern is being untreated, and then treated (that is D = [0,0,0, ..., 1,1,1...].
What if the policy pattern is being untreated, treated, and then untreated? That is the D = [0,0,0,0, ..., 1,1,1, ..., 0,0,0 ...]. Will the result still be valid? Can the result still be interpreted in the previous way?
Thanks,
Junjie
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, it will be valid, as long as you are willing to accept the assumption
that the treatment only has contemporaneous effects (as in two-way fixed
effects).
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 2:23 AM floydluo ***@***.***> wrote:
The ordinary policy pattern is being untreated, and then treated (that is
D = [0,0,0, ..., 1,1,1...].
What if the policy pattern is being untreated, treated, and then
untreated? That is the D = [0,0,0,0, ..., 1,1,1, ..., 0,0,0 ...]. Will the
result still be valid? Can the result still be interpreted in the previous
way?
Thanks,
Junjie
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB2PKGG4N6FHRBR7STQBBFTRWHXYXANCNFSM4N4FBL6A>
.
--
Yiqing Xu
Assistant Professor
Department of Political Science
Stanford University
http://yiqingxu.org/
The ordinary policy pattern is being untreated, and then treated (that is D = [0,0,0, ..., 1,1,1...].
What if the policy pattern is being untreated, treated, and then untreated? That is the D = [0,0,0,0, ..., 1,1,1, ..., 0,0,0 ...]. Will the result still be valid? Can the result still be interpreted in the previous way?
Thanks,
Junjie
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: