Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for byte-code-only builds #4

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 7, 2015
Merged

Support for byte-code-only builds #4

merged 4 commits into from
Dec 7, 2015

Conversation

yallop
Copy link
Owner

@yallop yallop commented Dec 5, 2015

@dbuenzli, @pqwy: could you please confirm this fixes #3 for you?

@dbuenzli
Copy link

dbuenzli commented Dec 5, 2015

Yes it does. Thanks for the quick fix !

@yallop
Copy link
Owner Author

yallop commented Dec 7, 2015

Building and installing the cmti file would be nice and forward looking.

I've added support in 3bde4ce.

@yallop yallop mentioned this pull request Dec 7, 2015
@yallop
Copy link
Owner Author

yallop commented Dec 7, 2015

and to be a really really really good citizen you could also build higher.cmxs conditional on opam's ocaml-native-dynlink variable.

I'll leave this for later (#5). Perhaps OCamlMakefile will acquire cmxs support, or perhaps we'll switch to a different build/install system.

yallop added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2015
Support for byte-code-only builds
@yallop yallop merged commit 07739ee into master Dec 7, 2015
@yallop yallop deleted the byte-code-builds branch December 10, 2015 22:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Building higher fails on bytecode only switches
2 participants