-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
get rid of autotools #23
Conversation
So what about this: (PR) mvidner@mrakoplas:kdump$ rpm -qlp \
/var/tmp/build-root-openSUSE_Factory/home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/yast2-kdump-devel-doc-3.1.19-1.x86_64.rpm
/usr/share/doc/packages/yast2-kdump
/usr/share/doc/packages/yast2-kdump/CONTRIBUTING.md |
I have changed the spec to use buildtools. |
@mvidner regarding doc subdir, maybe we can add there also generated yardoc which is not generating now |
On IRC you said that this did not change. But in fact, before this PR, the subpackage contains the yard docs: $ rpm -qlp /var/tmp/build-root-openSUSE_Factory/home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/yast2-kdump-devel-doc-3.1.19-1.x86_64.rpm
/usr/share/doc/packages/yast2-kdump
/usr/share/doc/packages/yast2-kdump/autodocs
/usr/share/doc/packages/yast2-kdump/autodocs/Yast
/usr/share/doc/packages/yast2-kdump/autodocs/Yast.html
/usr/share/doc/packages/yast2-kdump/autodocs/Yast/KdumpClass.html
/usr/share/doc/packages/yast2-kdump/autodocs/Yast/KdumpComplexInclude.html
/usr/share/doc/packages/yast2-kdump/autodocs/Yast/KdumpDialogsInclude.html
/usr/share/doc/packages/yast2-kdump/autodocs/Yast/KdumpHelpsInclude.html
/usr/share/doc/packages/yast2-kdump/autodocs/Yast/KdumpUifunctionsInclude.html
/usr/share/doc/packages/yast2-kdump/autodocs/Yast/KdumpWizardsInclude.html
/usr/share/doc/packages/yast2-kdump/autodocs/_index.html
/usr/share/doc/packages/yast2-kdump/autodocs/class_list.html
/usr/share/doc/packages/yast2-kdump/autodocs/css
/usr/share/doc/packages/yast2-kdump/autodocs/css/common.css
/usr/share/doc/packages/yast2-kdump/autodocs/css/full_list.css
/usr/share/doc/packages/yast2-kdump/autodocs/css/style.css
/usr/share/doc/packages/yast2-kdump/autodocs/file_list.html
/usr/share/doc/packages/yast2-kdump/autodocs/frames.html
/usr/share/doc/packages/yast2-kdump/autodocs/index.html
/usr/share/doc/packages/yast2-kdump/autodocs/js
/usr/share/doc/packages/yast2-kdump/autodocs/js/app.js
/usr/share/doc/packages/yast2-kdump/autodocs/js/full_list.js
/usr/share/doc/packages/yast2-kdump/autodocs/js/jquery.js
/usr/share/doc/packages/yast2-kdump/autodocs/method_list.html
/usr/share/doc/packages/yast2-kdump/autodocs/top-level-namespace.html For a leaf package like this I think the yard docs are useless as a RPM, so we should simply remove the subpackage. |
Hmm, some magic, probably in autotools generate it. So is there conclusion to not package it? @lslezak any opinion as I think you add it to autotools |
@jreidinger It is not magic. It is part of the cleaned up devtools that you have also worked on. |
Conflicts: .travis.yml
Otherwise this fails: $ rake check:pot /usr/bin/y2tool y2makepot y2tool: Can't find "y2makepot" in /usr/share/YaST2/data/devtools/bin This partially reverts commit 2fa24fd.
@lslezak I have updated this rather old PR. JFYI, I think it can wait for Pepa. |
@mvidner LGTM for me |
No description provided.