Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LCC.xsl:62-65: indirectly-related-pairs are pairs of... #119

Closed
0pdd opened this issue Jan 28, 2018 · 29 comments
Closed

LCC.xsl:62-65: indirectly-related-pairs are pairs of... #119

0pdd opened this issue Jan 28, 2018 · 29 comments
Labels

Comments

@0pdd
Copy link
Collaborator

0pdd commented Jan 28, 2018

The puzzle 9-7a54dc2b from #9 has to be resolved:

https://github.com/yegor256/jpeek/blob/b625770426cbfa670c987c135c0b3c98b7a24c8d/src/main/resources/org/jpeek/metrics/LCC.xsl#L62-L65

The puzzle was created by Kapralov Sergey on 26-Jan-18.

Estimate: 30 minutes, role: IMP.

If you have any technical questions, don't ask me, submit new tickets instead. The task will be "done" when the problem is fixed and the text of the puzzle is removed from the source code. Here is more about PDD and about me.

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Jan 28, 2018

@yegor256/z please, pay attention to this issue

@yegor256 yegor256 added the bug label Jan 28, 2018
@0crat 0crat added the scope label Jan 28, 2018
@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Jan 28, 2018

Job #119 is now in scope, role is DEV

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 13, 2018

The job #119 assigned to @rexim/z, here is why. The budget is 30 minutes, see §4. Please, read §8 and §9. If the task is not clear, read this and this.

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 18, 2018

@rexim/z this job was assigned to you 5 days ago. It will be taken away from you soon, unless you close it, see §8. Read this and this, please.

rexim added a commit to rexim/jpeek that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2018
rexim added a commit to rexim/jpeek that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2018
rexim added a commit to rexim/jpeek that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2018
rexim added a commit to rexim/jpeek that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2018
rexim added a commit to rexim/jpeek that referenced this issue Feb 20, 2018
@rexim
Copy link
Contributor

rexim commented Feb 20, 2018

@0crat waiting

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 20, 2018

@0crat waiting (here)

@rexim The impediment for #119 was registered successfully by @rexim/z

@0pdd
Copy link
Collaborator Author

0pdd commented Feb 22, 2018

@0pdd all puzzles are solved

2 similar comments
@0pdd
Copy link
Collaborator Author

0pdd commented Feb 23, 2018

@0pdd all puzzles are solved

@0pdd
Copy link
Collaborator Author

0pdd commented Feb 23, 2018

@0pdd all puzzles are solved

rexim added a commit to rexim/jpeek that referenced this issue Feb 24, 2018
@0pdd
Copy link
Collaborator Author

0pdd commented Feb 26, 2018

The puzzle 9-7a54dc2b has disappeared from the source code, that's why I closed this issue.

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 26, 2018

@ypshenychka/z please review this job, as in §30; the job will be fully closed and all payments will be made when the quality review is completed

@ypshenychka
Copy link

@rexim According to our QA Rules:

Some of ticket messages must mention all pull requests where the problem was actually fixed.

Please provide a link to corresponding PR in any of your messages.

@rexim
Copy link
Contributor

rexim commented Feb 26, 2018

@ypshenychka this issue was fixed in #202

@ypshenychka
Copy link

@rexim thanks

@ypshenychka
Copy link

@0crat quality acceptable

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 26, 2018

QA review completed: +8 points just awarded to @ypshenychka/z, total is +750

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 26, 2018

Order was finished, quality was "acceptable": +30 points just awarded to @rexim/z, total is +215

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 26, 2018

@0crat quality acceptable (here)

@ypshenychka You can't do that, unless you have one of these roles: ARC, PO. Your current roles are: QA.

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 27, 2018

The job #119 assigned to @llorllale/z, here is why. The budget is 30 minutes, see §4. Please, read §8 and §9. If the task is not clear, read this and this.

@yegor256
Copy link
Member

@0crat refuse

@yegor256
Copy link
Member

@0crat out

@0crat 0crat removed the scope label Feb 27, 2018
@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 27, 2018

@0crat refuse (here)

@yegor256 The user @llorllale/z resigned from #119, please stop working. Reason for job resignation: Order was cancelled

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 27, 2018

@0crat out (here)

@yegor256 The job #119 is now out of scope

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 27, 2018

@0crat out (here)

@yegor256 Job #119 was not in scope

@0pdd
Copy link
Collaborator Author

0pdd commented Feb 5, 2021

@0pdd the puzzle #504 is still not solved.

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 5, 2021

@0crat refuse (here)

@yegor256 Job gh:cqfn/jpeek#119 is not assigned, can't get performer

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 5, 2021

@0crat waiting (here)

@rexim Job gh:cqfn/jpeek#119 is not assigned, can't get performer

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 5, 2021

@0crat quality acceptable (here)

@ypshenychka You @ypshenychka/z need to have one of these roles in order to do "Complete QA review": ARC, QA; I'm sorry to say this, but at the moment you've got no roles in this project

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 5, 2021

@0crat out (here)

@yegor256 Job gh:cqfn/jpeek#119 is not assigned, can't get performer

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants