more

01-debating/01-debating.tex

@@ -46,18 +46,30 @@
   {Pope Francis offered some Valentine’s Day advice Friday for a lasting marriage, telling 25,000 \ul{lovebirds} that the recipe for success lies in saying three simple words: `\ul{Please}, \ul{thanks} and \ul{sorry}.'{}}
   {pope2014}
 
-\qte
-  [Jason Tsay]
-  {jason-tsay}
-  {We found that the level of a submitter's prior interaction on a project changed how \ul{politely} developers discussed the contribution and the nature of proposed alternative solutions.}
-  {tsay2014let}
-
 \qte
   [Kristine Nowak]
   {kristine-nowak}
   {Avatars that were more \ul{anthropomorphic} were perceived to be more \ul{attractive} and \ul{credible}. The strongest predictor of these variables, however, was the degree of masculinity or femininity (lack of androgyny) of an avatar.}
   {nowak2005influence}
 
+\qte
+  [Josh Terrell]
+  {josh-terrell}
+  {Surprisingly, our results show that women's contributions tend to be accepted \ul{more often} than men’s. However, for contributors who are outsiders to a project and their gender is identifiable, men's acceptance rates are \ul{higher}.}
+  {terrell2017gender}
+
+\qte
+  [Nasif Imtiaz]
+  {nasif-imtiaz}
+  {We found that women did not provide more information on competence and were not generally measured at a stricter standard than men. We observed that women were less likely to express \ul{politeness} and \ul{profanity} than men, and were more restrictive in expressing their \ul{sentiments} on the platform.}
+  {imtiaz2019investigating}
+
+\qte
+  [Reza Nadri]
+  {reza-nadri}
+  {We have identified that submitters perceptible as Hispanic and Black have 39\% of their pull requests rejected because they are seen as unnecessary, which is 10-12 percentage points more frequent than the rest of perceptible races.}
+  {nadri2021insights}
+
 \qte
   [Thomas Fackler]
   {thomas-fackler}

03-making-changes/03-making-changes.tex

@@ -29,6 +29,13 @@
 
 \pitch{.}
 
+\qte
+  [Jason Tsay]
+  {jason-tsay}
+  {We found that the level of a submitter's prior interaction on a project changed how \ul{politely} developers discussed the contribution and the nature of proposed alternative solutions.}
+  {tsay2014let}
+
+
 % make small pull requests
 % one fix per one PR
 % ping architect in pull request

main.bib

@@ -58,4 +58,33 @@ @inproceedings{tsay2014let
   booktitle={{Proceedings of the 22nd International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering}},
   pages={144--154},
   year={2014}
+}
+
+@article{terrell2017gender,
+  title={{Gender Differences and Bias in Open Source: Pull Request Acceptance of Women Versus Men}},
+  author={Terrell, Josh and Kofink, Andrew and Middleton, Justin and Rainear, Clarissa and Murphy-Hill, Emerson and Parnin, Chris and Stallings, Jon},
+  journal={{PeerJ Computer Science}},
+  volume={3},
+  pages={e111},
+  year={2017},
+  publisher={PeerJ Inc.}
+}
+
+@inproceedings{imtiaz2019investigating,
+  title={{Investigating the Effects of Gender Bias on GitHub}},
+  author={Imtiaz, Nasif and Middleton, Justin and Chakraborty, Joymallya and Robson, Neill and Bai, Gina and Murphy-Hill, Emerson},
+  booktitle={{Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)}},
+  pages={700--711},
+  year={2019},
+  organization={IEEE}
+}
+
+@article{nadri2021insights,
+  title={{Insights into Nonmerged Pull Requests in GitHub: Is There Evidence of Bias Based on Perceptible Race?}},
+  author={Nadri, Reza and Rodriguez-Perez, Gema and Nagappan, Meiyappan},
+  journal={IEEE Software},
+  volume={38},
+  number={2},
+  pages={51--57},
+  year={2021}
 }

osbp.sty

@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
 \end{pptMiddle}}
 
 \newcommand\pitch[1]{\plush{\begin{pptMiddle} #1 \end{pptMiddle}}}
-\newcommand\qte[4][]{\pitch{\pptQuote[\scriptsize\scshape\textcolor{gray}{#1}]{../faces/#2.jpg}{#3}{\textcolor{gray}{\small\bibentry{#4}}}}}
+\newcommand\qte[4][]{\pitch{\pptQuote[\scriptsize\scshape\color{gray}{#1}]{../faces/#2.jpg}{#3}{\par\color{gray}\rmfamily\scriptsize\bibentry{#4}}}}
 
 \AtBeginDocument{%
   \pptLeft{\thetitle{}}%