Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update ava to the latest version 🚀 #5

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 2, 2017
Merged

Conversation

greenkeeper[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@greenkeeper greenkeeper bot commented Aug 15, 2017

Version 0.22.0 of ava just got published.

Dependency ava
Current Version 0.21.0
Type devDependency

The version 0.22.0 is not covered by your current version range.

Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.

I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of ava.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.


Release Notes 0.22.0

There's but a few commits in this release, but we've made a big change to how AVA manages its test workers 👩🏼‍🔬👨🏼‍🏭👨🏿‍🚀👨🏻‍⚕️👩🏽‍💼.

Highlights

Default concurrency

We now cap the number of concurrent workers to the number of CPU cores on your machine. Previously AVA started workers for each test file, so if you had many test files this could actually bring things to a halt. 465fcec

You can still customize the concurrency by setting the concurrency option in AVA's package.json configuration, or by passing the --concurrency flag. We've also beefed up input validation on that flag. b6eef5a

Unfortunately this does change how test.only() behaves. AVA can no longer guarantee that normal tests won't run. For now, if you want to use test.only(), you should run tests from just that file. We have an open issue to add an --only flag, which will ensure that AVA runs just the test.only() tests. If you'd like to help us with that please head on over to #1472.

t.log()

We've also added t.log(), which lets you print a log message contextually alongside the test result, instead of immediately printing it to stdout like console.log. 14f7095

Miscellaneous

All changes

v0.21.0...v0.22.0

Thanks

💖 Huge thanks to @abouthiroppy, @ydaniv, @nowells, @melisoner2006, @clayzermk1 and @tdeschryver for helping us with this release. We couldn’t have done it without you!

Get involved

We welcome new contributors. AVA is a friendly place to get started in open source. We have a great article on getting started contributing and a comprehensive contributing guide.

Commits

The new version differs by 10 commits.

  • dd9e8b2 0.22.0
  • b6eef5a Fail hard when --concurrency is set to invalid values (#1478)
  • 57f5007 Fix typo in t.notThrows example (#1486)
  • d8c21a6 Update debugging with webstorm recipe (#1483)
  • 14f7095 Implement t.log() (#1452)
  • e28be05 Fixed makeApp() in endpoint testing recipe (#1479)
  • 465fcec Limit concurrency to the number of CPU cores (#1467)
  • 4eea226 Use --verbose when testing CLI output (#1477)
  • a0d5b37 Simplify readme avatar URLs
  • 31b1380 Add tests for improper-usage-messages (#1462)

See the full diff

Not sure how things should work exactly?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and of course you may always ask my humans.


Your Greenkeeper Bot 🌴

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 15, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 92.727% when pulling 5bc88ff on greenkeeper/ava-0.22.0 into 494f182 on master.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 92.727% when pulling 5bc88ff on greenkeeper/ava-0.22.0 into 494f182 on master.

@yourtion yourtion merged commit e3c1433 into master Sep 2, 2017
@greenkeeper greenkeeper bot deleted the greenkeeper/ava-0.22.0 branch September 2, 2017 15:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants