Better number formatting

[Dlurak]

Optimize the formatting of big numbers.
Previously:

Now:

Here is an example

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Updated (UTC)
osmapp	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	Jun 3, 2024 10:26pm

[zbycz]

In osm there are a lot of numbers which have to be shown exactly, eg. reference numbers, or start_year, i guess there will be more. I don't this it is a good idea to use compact format, because it makes it unreadable.

btw, if you considering what to do next, there is your Layer index PR #298 which i am really looking forward to 🙂 🤞

[Dlurak]

I will probably work on the layer index this or next weekend.
Now the formatted number is only displayed for the tag population without creating a custom renderer.
Maybe there are even more tags which should have a formatted number. E.g. capacity. Do you have more ideas?

Refrence code
Start date
Population

[zbycz]

@Dlurak

ad layer-index) no worries, i just wanted to know you didnt forget about it :)

ad only poplutaion) I have one more issue with this. When i check "show tags" option, I would prefer to see the exact value. As it would be ugly to pass the context, I suggest changing the formatter to the basic one (which just adds thousands delimiter). Do you think the population will be readable enough that way?
(In case you implement it, would it work to pass intl.lang to show correct delimiters for different languages?)

Please also remove the comment (the code is clear) and fix typo in foratter.

ad capacity) I don't think it is good idea to round the number to k/M/G suffix. Not all users understand it anyway. If you only add the basic one with delimiters, then capacity is fine.. Please find examples for more tags.