Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Zeal gets activated with the wrong shortcut #1557

Open
agatti opened this issue Sep 29, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Zeal gets activated with the wrong shortcut #1557

agatti opened this issue Sep 29, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@agatti
Copy link

agatti commented Sep 29, 2023

Not sure if the problem is in Zeal or in Qt's frameworks though, but here it goes:

If I set Ctrl+Shift+/ as a global shortcut to display Zeal using a US keyboard layout, Zeal gets activated on both Ctrl+/ and Ctrl+Shift+/.

The shortcut shown in the configuration dialog is also incorrect, as it displays Ctrl+? rather than Ctrl+Shift+/.

This is on 0.7.0 as packaged in Arch's extra repository, with Qt6 version 6.5.3 also from Arch's extra repository.

@novaTopFlex
Copy link

I am not aware of any shortcuts specific to the opening and closing process of the Zeal documentation browser. If there are such shortcuts, I do not believe that they would have been set with Zeal, so try asking the frameworks of the appropriate Qt version (Qt6).


The latest releases of the older Qt5 may be more stable and more successfully able to differentiate between the shortcuts (with the Shift key vs. without the Shift key). However, the development team may drop support for this older Qt5 version soon if they have not already, so I would still recommend attempting to return to Qt6 within the next eighteen (18) months.

@novaTopFlex
Copy link

The only shortcut that I am aware of for opening and closing a Zeal that is already open is with the application icon on the applicable system tray (systray), if available.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants