json: Add runnable for package.json and composer.json scripts

[RemcoSmitsDev]

Package.json

Screen.Recording.2024-05-25.at.17.42.48.mov

Composer.json

Screen.Recording.2024-05-26.at.12.27.09.mov

Release Notes:

• Added runnable for package.json and composer.json scripts (#12215).

[znycheporuk]

To change runner from npm to yarn, for example. Do I have to copy task and replace npm run with yarn, or is it possible, to configure runner somehow?

[Angelk90]

@RemcoSmitsDev , @znycheporuk : The question is whether I need to use npx or even bun to execute a command.

[RemcoSmitsDev]

@znycheporuk @Angelk90

See the following comment on my JavaScript runnable PR #12118 (comment). We want to make something like that, but I'm not sure if we want to merge this and first just let people duplicate the task if they want to use a different runner or make it more user-friendly first.

[RemcoSmitsDev]

@osiewicz It might be cool to be able to specify a filename pattern that the task is allowed to show up. This way, we could separate package.json and composer.json scripts and not show the runnable when your JSON file contains these keys.

[znycheporuk]

@RemcoSmitsDev, I agree that it would be cool to specify env variables for tasks like this

tasks:
  javascript:
    TEST_RUNNER: jest

In my opinion if adding this functionality will take an additional week or two, it's probably better to wait until it can be implemented in a more general way. However, if there's no clear timeline for when it will be possible to use such variables in tasks, then merge the PR as it is and update the task later.

[osiewicz]

I'm out in the latter half of the next week, so I'd rather have us start with something (even if it's not ideal) and then refine it once user-provided task variables do land.

[osiewicz]

@osiewicz It might be cool to be able to specify a filename pattern that the task is allowed to show up. This way, we could separate package.json and composer.json scripts and not show the runnable when your JSON file contains these keys.

I think that would be feasible to do, yeah

[osiewicz]

LGTM :)

[RemcoSmitsDev]

Should be good to go now!