Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix syncing page titles #439

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 15, 2024
Merged

Fix syncing page titles #439

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 15, 2024

Conversation

julianrubino
Copy link
Member

@julianrubino julianrubino commented Aug 15, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Improved the formatting of headings in the syncing documentation for better clarity and organization.
    • Enhanced the hierarchical structure by adjusting Mainnet and Testnet section headings to clearly indicate their relationship within the content.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Aug 15, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Aug 15, 2024 0:40am

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 15, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The recent changes to the syncing.mdx file focus on enhancing the document's structural clarity by adjusting the heading levels for the Mainnet and Testnet sections. This adjustment promotes a more organized hierarchy, helping readers navigate the content more easily while ensuring the integrity of other formatting elements remains intact.

Changes

Files Change Summary
src/pages/nodes/start-here/syncing.mdx Adjusted heading levels for Mainnet and Testnet sections to level 5, improving document hierarchy. No changes to exported or public entity declarations.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Document
    User->>Document: Request for syncing information
    Document-->>User: Provide structured content
    alt Mainnet or Testnet
        Document->>User: Show Mainnet/Testnet details
    end
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d8fccff and f3b81cc.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/pages/nodes/start-here/syncing.mdx (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • src/pages/nodes/start-here/syncing.mdx

@fadeev fadeev merged commit 09d306b into main Aug 15, 2024
5 of 6 checks passed
@fadeev fadeev deleted the fix-syncing-page-snapshots branch August 15, 2024 14:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants