Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: bump ethermint #2854

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 10, 2024
Merged

chore: bump ethermint #2854

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 10, 2024

Conversation

skosito
Copy link
Contributor

@skosito skosito commented Sep 9, 2024

Description

zeta-chain/ethermint#112

this update closes: #1572 and #2836

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Tested CCTX in localnet
  • Tested in development environment
  • Go unit tests
  • Go integration tests
  • Tested via GitHub Actions

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated dependency versions for improved compatibility and potential bug fixes.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 9, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request involves updates to the go.mod file, specifically changing the version requirements for the github.com/zeta-chain/ethermint and gopkg.in/yaml.v3 dependencies. The ethermint dependency has been upgraded to a newer version, while a comment associated with the yaml dependency has been removed. These modifications aim to maintain compatibility with updated package versions.

Changes

File Change Summary
go.mod Updated github.com/zeta-chain/ethermint version from v0.0.0-20240729121328-43bf9ddbf82f to v0.0.0-20240909234716-2fad916e7179 and removed comment from gopkg.in/yaml.v3 version v3.0.1.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Ethermint
    participant YAML

    User->>Ethermint: Request updated version
    Ethermint-->>User: Provide new version v0.0.0-20240909234716-2fad916e7179
    User->>YAML: Check YAML version
    YAML-->>User: Confirm version v3.0.1
Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Duplicates in transaction logs (#1572) The changes do not address the issue of duplicates in transaction logs.

Tip

New review model

We have updated our review workflow to use the Anthropic's Claude family of models. Please share any feedback in the discussion post on our Discord.


New features

Walkthrough comment now includes:

  • Possibly related PRs: A list of potentially related PRs to help you recall past context.
  • Suggested labels: CodeRabbit can now suggest labels by learning from your past PRs. You can also provide custom labeling instructions in the UI or configuration file.

Notes:

  • Please share any feedback in the discussion post on our Discord.
  • Possibly related PRs, automatic label suggestions based on past PRs, learnings, and possibly related issues require data opt-in (enabled by default).

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Member

@lumtis lumtis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b251df6 and 010fdf1.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (1)
  • go.mod (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • go.mod

@skosito skosito added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 10, 2024
Merged via the queue into develop with commit f8f65f9 Sep 10, 2024
33 checks passed
@skosito skosito deleted the bump-ethermint branch September 10, 2024 00:30
@lumtis lumtis mentioned this pull request Sep 9, 2024
11 tasks
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Sep 30, 2024
5 tasks
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 8, 2024
6 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
no-changelog Skip changelog CI check
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

MsgEthereumTx emits wrong coin received log entries in cosmos event logs duplicates in tx logs
3 participants