Merge Upstream #3
Conversation
This updates github.com/rogpeppe/go-internal from 1.6.1 to 1.8.0 and the github action 'setup-go' from v1 to v2. It also adds a config file for dependabot to automatically check this repo for new dependency versions weekly.
Bumps [actions/checkout](https://github.com/actions/checkout) from 2 to 3. - [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/checkout/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/actions/checkout/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](actions/checkout@v2...v3) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: actions/checkout dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-major ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This handles a few cases (similar to how fmt %#v does): - A GoString method on a value receiver, called with a nil pointer - A GoString method on a pointer receiver that doesn't check for nil - A GoString method that panics in some other way Because Go 1.17 added a method Time.GoString with value receiver, this broke structs that had *time.Time fields with nil values (which is common!). Also added a bunch of tests for these cases. Fixes kr#77 Co-authored-by: Jordan Barrett <jordan.barrett@canonical.com>
This change bumps github.com/rogpeppe/go-internal from version 1.8.0 to 1.9.0. Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sync with master first to refresh go.mod / go.sum and run tests again, before merging PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@mcDevnagh the build fails on GitHub CI, but go test -v passes fine locally for me on your kr-main branch.
Is this expected? Is it something that gets resolved after merge because of the github.com/zk-org/pretty url change?
Or is it something we should fix here before merging to zk-org main?
Otherwise everything is looking fine.
|
Hey @mickael-menu . Pinging you on this one, just to double check that we're handling this the right way. |
|
Have you tried bumping the Go version in the CI workflow? I think that might impact the output. But I think it's fine if you prefer to use directly the upstream |
|
Yup that did it :) Thanks again! |
|
thanks for handling this one gents |
and fix merge conflicts