Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AlgorithmIdentifier encoding (Section 7.1.3.1, CAB-Forum BR) #642

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Jan 15, 2022

Conversation

mtgag
Copy link
Contributor

@mtgag mtgag commented Oct 21, 2021

This pull request adds a lint for Section 7.1.3.1 of CAB BR (introduced in v1.7.1 - https://cabforum.org/wp-content/uploads/CA-Browser-Forum-BR-1.7.1.pdf), in particular regarding the encoding of AlgorithmIdentifier for public keys. This lints is related to lint_mp_ecdsa_pub_key_encoding_correct.go. Please consider the lint for inclusion in zlint project.

Copy link
Member

@christopher-henderson christopher-henderson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems reasonable to me, thank you!

mtgag and others added 3 commits October 27, 2021 08:13
…hm_object_identifier_encoding.go

Co-authored-by: Ryan Sleevi <ryan.sleevi@gmail.com>
@mtgag
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtgag commented Jan 14, 2022

I briefly wanted to ask whether this pull request is still considered for inclusion? Is there somethig to do on our side?

@christopher-henderson
Copy link
Member

(thank you for your patience, the repo went largely silent over the holidays)

@mtgag the code changes still look good to me, and @sleevi I believe it looks like your comments were addressed.

Copy link
Contributor

@sleevi sleevi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the heads up @christopher-henderson - Looks good to me.

@christopher-henderson christopher-henderson merged commit b4a225e into zmap:master Jan 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants