Permissive Binary License sometimes referred to as Public Binary License

[adamgreen]

In the https://github.com/ARMmbed/Handbook/blob/5.4/docs/cont/contributing.md#how-to-apply-pbl-correctly section of the Handbook the PBL is sometimes expanded to Public Binary License but in most places (including the legal license description), it is referred to as the Permissive Binary License.

Examples of where it appears to be named incorrectly in this section:

Unless specifically indicated otherwise in a file, files are licensed under the Public Binary License, 
as can be found in: LICENSE-permissive-binary-license-1.0.txt

• The full original Public Binary License 1.0 text in LICENSE-permissive-binary-license-1.0.txt.

[AnotherButler]

@jlovejoy Could you please help me fix the wording?

[jlovejoy]

Good catch! yes, it should be "permissive" not "public" (or unofficially, PB might refer to someone's initials... ;)
I just submitted a PR, as the header notice needed a bit updating that @pjbakker and I came up with some time ago, but forgot to update it here as well.

[AnotherButler]

Thank you so much. You are awesome.

[AnotherButler]

Thanks for raising this issue, @adamgreen. We just merged PR #137, which should resolve this issue.

[adamgreen]

Thanks @AnotherButler and @jlovejoy.