Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ble: Fix persistence in SecurityDB #13942

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 26, 2020

Conversation

paul-szczepanek-arm
Copy link
Member

Summary of changes

There is a set of bugs that interfere with BLE bonding persistence.
The connected flag was is not being updated when entry are found. This sets the flag at appropriate places.
It also updates the peer address if the entry found based on EDIV and Rand does not match the peer address.
The KVStore Security db implementation initialises indices in the array of entries incorrectly. This removes the index altogether and uses the memory address to get the index instead.

Impact of changes

Migration actions required

Documentation

none


Pull request type

[x] Patch update (Bug fix / Target update / Docs update / Test update / Refactor)
[] Feature update (New feature / Functionality change / New API)
[] Major update (Breaking change E.g. Return code change / API behaviour change)

Test results

[] No Tests required for this change (E.g docs only update)
[x] Covered by existing mbed-os tests (Greentea or Unittest)
[] Tests / results supplied as part of this PR

Reviewers


@ciarmcom ciarmcom added the release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch label Nov 23, 2020
@ciarmcom
Copy link
Member

@paul-szczepanek-arm, thank you for your changes.
@ARMmbed/mbed-os-connectivity @ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers please review.

@ciarmcom ciarmcom requested review from a team November 23, 2020 09:30
flags->connected = true;

/* update peer address */
SecurityDistributionFlags_t* old_flags = get_distribution_flags(*db_handle);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does it matter to update the peer address ?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, address changed, otherwise we would've found it by address

@mergify mergify bot added needs: CI and removed needs: review labels Nov 25, 2020
@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Nov 25, 2020

CI started

@0xc0170 0xc0170 changed the title Fix persistence in SecurityDB ble: Fix persistence in SecurityDB Nov 25, 2020
@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Nov 25, 2020

Jenkins CI Test : ✔️ SUCCESS

Build Number: 1 | 🔒 Jenkins CI Job | 🌐 Logs & Artifacts

CLICK for Detailed Summary

jobs Status
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_unittests ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_dynamic-memory-usage ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-test ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_greentea-test ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cloud-client-pytest ✔️

@0xc0170 0xc0170 merged commit dd432a3 into ARMmbed:master Nov 26, 2020
@mergify mergify bot removed the ready for merge label Nov 26, 2020
@mbedmain mbedmain added release-version: 6.6.0 Release-pending and removed release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch Release-pending labels Dec 11, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants