Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CMake Maxim: fix targets naming #14270

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 15, 2021
Merged

Conversation

0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

@0xc0170 0xc0170 commented Feb 11, 2021

Add boot no-boot targets for max32625. This should be cleaned up better once we get
the folder structure enforced by the old tools fixed.

Summary of changes

Set the CMake naming for Maxim targets.

Impact of changes

Migration actions required

Documentation


Pull request type

[x] Patch update (Bug fix / Target update / Docs update / Test update / Refactor)
[] Feature update (New feature / Functionality change / New API)
[] Major update (Breaking change E.g. Return code change / API behaviour change)

Test results

[x] No Tests required for this change (E.g docs only update)
[] Covered by existing mbed-os tests (Greentea or Unittest)
[] Tests / results supplied as part of this PR

Reviewers


TARGET_MAX32630FTHR
)

target_sources(mbed-core
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this needs fixing, on it, somehow the target was left out

Add boot no-boot targets for max32625. This should be cleaned up better once we get
the folder structure enforced by the old tools fixed.
@ciarmcom ciarmcom added the release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch label Feb 11, 2021
@ciarmcom ciarmcom requested review from a team February 11, 2021 17:30
@ciarmcom
Copy link
Member

@0xc0170, thank you for your changes.
@ARMmbed/team-maximintegrated @ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers please review.

@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor Author

0xc0170 commented Feb 11, 2021

I built couple of targets, added few fixes. I'll continue testing tomorrow morning (one more ld error oustanding).

Forgotten to set it for the target
@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor Author

0xc0170 commented Feb 12, 2021

CI started to get early results

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Feb 12, 2021

Jenkins CI Test : ✔️ SUCCESS

Build Number: 1 | 🔒 Jenkins CI Job | 🌐 Logs & Artifacts

CLICK for Detailed Summary

jobs Status
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_unittests ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-test ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_greentea-test ✔️

Co-authored-by: Hugues Kamba-Mpiana <41612201+hugueskamba@users.noreply.github.com>
@mergify mergify bot dismissed hugueskamba’s stale review February 14, 2021 19:21

Pull request has been modified.

@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor Author

0xc0170 commented Feb 15, 2021

I fixed MAX32630FTHR CMake, builds OK locally

@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor Author

0xc0170 commented Feb 15, 2021

CI started

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Feb 15, 2021

Jenkins CI Test : ✔️ SUCCESS

Build Number: 2 | 🔒 Jenkins CI Job | 🌐 Logs & Artifacts

CLICK for Detailed Summary

jobs Status
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_unittests ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-test ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_greentea-test ✔️

@0xc0170 0xc0170 merged commit 4c58112 into ARMmbed:master Feb 15, 2021
@mergify mergify bot removed the ready for merge label Feb 15, 2021
@mbedmain mbedmain added release-version: 6.8.0 Release-pending and removed release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch Release-pending labels Feb 16, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants