Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DISCO L475VG IOT01A: heap in SRAM2 region #9588

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Feb 4, 2019

Conversation

Projects
None yet
8 participants
@naveenkaje
Copy link
Contributor

commented Feb 1, 2019

Description

Fix Pelion client failure on STM32 Discovery IOT board due to heap running out. Update bootloader binary built with QSPI storage.

Pull request type

[x] Fix
[ ] Refactor
[ ] Target update
[ ] Functionality change
[ ] Docs update
[ ] Test update
[ ] Breaking change

@ciarmcom ciarmcom requested a review from ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers Feb 1, 2019

@ciarmcom

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

commented Feb 1, 2019

@naveenkaje, thank you for your changes.
@ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers please review.

@cmonr

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Feb 2, 2019

Replaces #9434

@cmonr

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Feb 2, 2019

CI started

@cmonr

cmonr approved these changes Feb 2, 2019

@cmonr cmonr added needs: CI and removed needs: review labels Feb 2, 2019

@mbed-ci

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented Feb 2, 2019

Test run: SUCCESS

Summary: 12 of 12 test jobs passed
Build number : 1
Build artifacts

@0xc0170

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

commented Feb 4, 2019

Support disco #9588

Title of the PR is important , please provide meaningful name . It is used in the release notes. I'll edit it this time

@0xc0170 0xc0170 changed the title Support disco DISCO L475VG IOT01A: heap in SRAM2 region, updating bootloader Feb 4, 2019

@0xc0170 0xc0170 changed the title DISCO L475VG IOT01A: heap in SRAM2 region, updating bootloader DISCO L475VG IOT01A: heap in SRAM2 region Feb 4, 2019

@0xc0170 0xc0170 merged commit 6e0fceb into ARMmbed:master Feb 4, 2019

27 checks passed

continuous-integration/jenkins/pr-head This commit looks good
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
jenkins-ci/build-ARM Success
Details
jenkins-ci/build-ARMC6 Success
Details
jenkins-ci/build-GCC_ARM Success
Details
jenkins-ci/build-IAR Success
Details
jenkins-ci/cloud-client-test Success
Details
jenkins-ci/dynamic-memory-usage RTOS ROM(+0 bytes) RAM(+0 bytes)
Details
jenkins-ci/exporter Success
Details
jenkins-ci/greentea-test Success
Details
jenkins-ci/mbed2-build-ARM Success
Details
jenkins-ci/mbed2-build-GCC_ARM Success
Details
jenkins-ci/mbed2-build-IAR Success
Details
jenkins-ci/unittests Success
Details
travis-ci/astyle Local astyle testing has passed
Details
travis-ci/docs Local docs testing has passed
Details
travis-ci/doxy-spellcheck Local doxy-spellcheck testing has passed
Details
travis-ci/events Passed, runtime is 9127 cycles (-1396 cycles)
Details
travis-ci/gitattributestest Local gitattributestest testing has passed
Details
travis-ci/include_check Local include_check testing has passed
Details
travis-ci/licence_check Local licence_check testing has passed
Details
travis-ci/littlefs Passed, code size is 8408B (+0.00%)
Details
travis-ci/psa-autogen Local psa-autogen testing has passed
Details
travis-ci/tools-py2.7 Local tools-py2.7 testing has passed
Details
travis-ci/tools-py3.5 Local tools-py3.5 testing has passed
Details
travis-ci/tools-py3.6 Local tools-py3.6 testing has passed
Details
travis-ci/tools-py3.7 Local tools-py3.7 testing has passed
Details

@0xc0170 0xc0170 removed the ready for merge label Feb 4, 2019

@adbridge

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Feb 8, 2019

This is updating changes on top of stack size changes introduced in #9092 which is targeting 5.12, thus this will also need to go to 5.12

@screamerbg

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented on aa2d49a Feb 19, 2019

@linlingao Do you think that the same could be introduced for IAR and ARMCC as well, e.g. move BSS to SRAM2?

CC @LMESTM @jeromecoutant

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor Author

replied Feb 19, 2019

@screamerbg Changes to IAR and ARMCC should have been committed under #9588.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.