-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Branch a searchcommand #35
Branch a searchcommand #35
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #35 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 74.73% 74.94% +0.21%
- Complexity 442 456 +14
============================================
Files 74 76 +2
Lines 1417 1453 +36
Branches 139 144 +5
============================================
+ Hits 1059 1089 +30
- Misses 324 327 +3
- Partials 34 37 +3 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
/** | ||
* Format search instructions for every command for display. | ||
*/ | ||
public class SearchCommand extends Command { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it be better to change the class name to SearchTagCommand? Since there is a possibility of implementing search by person in the future
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes. I have renamed it to search tag. As of now, for the current search command, it is named as search only as no implementation of searching by other means exist yet.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
Did the search command, have also done the checkstyle