Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider using ktn_dodger instead of epp_dodger for parsing #25

Closed
juanbono opened this issue Nov 16, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

Consider using ktn_dodger instead of epp_dodger for parsing #25

juanbono opened this issue Nov 16, 2019 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@juanbono
Copy link
Collaborator

juanbono commented Nov 16, 2019

We can try using ktn_dodger from katana-code, after inaka/katana-code#31 is merged, instead of epp_dodger to parse the source files.

@elbrujohalcon elbrujohalcon changed the title Consider using Aleppo instead of epp_dodger for parsing Consider using ktn_dodger instead of epp_dodger for parsing Nov 29, 2019
@juanbono juanbono self-assigned this Dec 2, 2019
juanbono added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 11, 2019
* add katana-code

* replace epp_dodger with ktn_dodger

* add file for testing number formatting

* uncomment post_hooks

* use katana-code from hex.pm

* update rebar.lock

* add katana_code to applications

* update katana-code version

* add katana_code bin to format script
@juanbono
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Now we use katana-code instead of epp_dodger (#35 ).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant